Skip to main content

Security report for sitebrunch.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sitebrunch is a newly established technology company (founded in 2024) offering an integrated SaaS platform for website owners and marketers that combines accessibility checks, web tracking, live heatmaps, user flow analysis, comments, and campaign tracking into a single tool. The website is built using modern design tools such as Framer and hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, reflecting a contemporary technical infrastructure. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Varify.io scripts indicates moderate user tracking and marketing analytics capabilities. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and a clean domain status, but lacks advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and security headers, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is currently weak due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information is provided. Overall, the website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good design and user experience, but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation to increase trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitebrunch.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sitebrunch targets website owners and digital marketers seeking a comprehensive analytics and accessibility tool. Its business model is SaaS-based, focusing on delivering multiple website monitoring and user behavior analysis features in one platform. The company is positioned as a niche player in the website analytics market, leveraging modern web technologies and cloud hosting. The lack of detailed business information, contact data, and certifications suggests a small-sized startup in early stages. The use of AWS and Framer indicates a lean technical stack optimized for rapid deployment. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Growth potential depends on expanding trust signals, compliance adherence, and marketing transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid domain status, hosted on AWS, which provides a solid baseline for security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were detected in the provided content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Varify.io introduces moderate tracking but no direct security risks were identified. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates immature security governance. To improve, the company should implement security headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish clear security and privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Accessibility Checks, Web Tracking, Live Heatmaps, User Flows, Comments & Kampagnen Tacking in einem Tool.
Key services
Accessibility Checks, Web Tracking, Live Heatmaps, User Flows, Comments, Campaign Tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Tag Manager, Varify.io, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status OK

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Varify.io
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Varify.io
Marketing tools
Varify.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built using Framer, indicating modern design tools.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not found in the provided HTML.
  4. Multiple third-party tracking scripts are used, including Google Tag Manager and Varify.io.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Domain is newly registered and hosted on AWS infrastructure.
  7. Content is in German with English alternate language links.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern web fonts and asynchronous JavaScript loading for performance optimization. Hosting is provided by Amazon AWS, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The tech stack includes Google Tag Manager and Varify.io for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced optimization. No CMS beyond Framer is detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script management. Technical debt appears low but security enhancements are needed to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitebrunch.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitebrunch.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.