Skip to main content

Security report for sirowa.lv

SIROWA Group · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIROWA Group operates as a wholesale distributor specializing in cosmetics and beauty care products, positioning itself as an experienced regional player in this retail sector. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a focus on wholesale distribution of well-known brands in the health and beauty industry. The digital infrastructure is based on WordPress, enhanced with modern tools such as Brizy Builder and FontAwesome, and utilizes Cloudflare for DNS services. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile responsiveness, and basic SEO optimization, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no accessible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the domain registration data supports legitimacy and transparency, with a long-established domain and no privacy protection masking registrant details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sirowa.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SIROWA Group's market positioning as a wholesale dealer in cosmetics and beauty care products targets distributors and wholesale buyers in the region. The business model centers on distribution partnerships with world-famous brands, indicating a B2B focus. The company appears to have a stable market presence since its domain was registered in 2003. The website content and metadata emphasize wholesale and health and beauty care sectors. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, and no explicit partnership domains were identified. Revenue streams likely derive from wholesale sales and distribution agreements. The use of Microsoft Clarity analytics suggests an interest in user behavior insights to optimize marketing and sales strategies.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a domain status that prevents unauthorized transfers, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security robustness. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The site uses third-party scripts including Microsoft Clarity for analytics, which introduces moderate tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No contact channels for security issues were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, publishing policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIROWA Group
Description
SIROWA Group - one of the most experienced wholesale dealers of cosmetics and beauty care products of the region has been the distributor of the world famous brands.
Key services
Wholesale distribution of cosmetics, Beauty care product distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, FontAwesome, Brizy Builder, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based wholesale cosmetics distributor site.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Uses Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Domain is well-established and not privacy protected, indicating transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Brizy page builder and uses FontAwesome for icons. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS services, which provides performance and security benefits. The site includes modern SEO meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses Microsoft Clarity for analytics, indicating a focus on user behavior analysis. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers suggests some technical debt in security best practices. The site would benefit from modernization efforts focused on security hardening and enhanced privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sirowa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sirowa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.