Skip to main content

Security report for sirjoseph.cz

Sir Joseph s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sir Joseph s.r.o. is a Czech family-owned company specializing in expedition down clothing and sleeping bags, with a heritage dating back to 1974 founded by Josef Rakoncaj, a renowned mountaineer. The company operates a professional e-commerce website targeting outdoor enthusiasts and mountaineers, offering specialized products with a strong brand presence in the niche market. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive product information and customer support resources. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern plugins and CDN services to ensure performance and multilingual support. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts domain transparency and trust but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional presentation and business information. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie management. Overall, the site represents a credible and professional business with moderate technical maturity and good security hygiene.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sirjoseph.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the specialized outdoor retail sector, leveraging its founder's reputation and decades of experience. Its business model focuses on direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales of high-quality expedition gear. The target customers are mountaineers and outdoor enthusiasts requiring reliable, high-performance clothing and equipment. The website supports multiple languages and markets, including a dedicated EU domain. The company maintains active social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The business demonstrates consistent branding and trust signals such as privacy policies and secure shopping features. Growth potential exists through product innovation and expanding international reach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of security and privacy requirements. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable WordPress plugins and CDN services supports security but requires ongoing maintenance to mitigate risks. Security headers are partially implemented; adding CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers would strengthen defenses. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sir Joseph s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sir Joseph s.r.o.
Description
Expediční horolezecké péřové oblečení a spací pytle
Key services
Manufacture and sale of expedition down clothing, Sale of sleeping bags, Customer support and product guidance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Woo Variation Swatches, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Complianz GDPR plugin, FooBox Image Lightbox
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPML
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Complianz GDPR)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
WooCommerce Enhanced Ecommerce
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to outdoor retail
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and CDN for performance
  6. Clear contact information and social media presence
  7. No security policy or incident response info publicly available
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and WPBakery for page building. It uses a CDN (Bunny CDN) for asset delivery, improving load times and reliability. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is multilingual, supported by WPML. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is standard for professional e-commerce sites but requires continuous updates and security monitoring to maintain integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sirjoseph.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sirjoseph.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.