Skip to main content

Security report for sirius-opava.cz

Sírius, příspěvková organizace · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sírius, příspěvková organizace, is a Czech non-profit social service provider focused on supporting people with disabilities who cannot live in their natural environment and require assistance. The organization operates primarily in the Moravskoslezský region, offering services such as residential homes for disabled persons, protected housing, respite care, and social-health care. The website reflects a stable regional presence with clear contact information, social media engagement, and partnership with local government entities. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with Kentico CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design principles, ensuring good user experience and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protections, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and a privacy policy page. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-suited to its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sirius-opava.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sirius-opava.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sirius-opava.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong regional position as a social service provider in the Czech Republic, targeting individuals with disabilities requiring specialized care. Its business model is non-profit, funded and supported by regional government and partners. The website indicates active community engagement through events and partnerships with local institutions, schools, and charities. The presence of multiple service offerings and a clear navigation structure suggests a mature operational model. The partnership ecosystem includes government bodies, educational institutions, and charitable organizations, enhancing credibility and reach. No direct revenue streams are visible, consistent with a public social service entity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and forms include CSRF tokens, reducing common web attack risks. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing, loaded asynchronously to minimize performance impact. However, some recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are missing, which could improve defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy pages are not present, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance documentation. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced header policies and documented security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy or incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them timely.
  4. Enhance privacy disclosures with detailed data retention policies and user rights information.
  5. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user and service provider responsibilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sírius, příspěvková organizace
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sírius, příspěvková organizace
Description
Sírius je sociální služba pro osoby s postižením, které nemohou žít ve svém přirozeném prostředí a potřebují pomoc a podporu v životě. Poskytuje individualizované služby na základě nasmlouvaných podmínek tak, aby mohli využívat všechny běžné příležitosti.
Key services
Domovy pro osoby se zdravotním postižením, Chráněné bydlení, Odlehčovací služba, Sociálně - zdravotní péče
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Slider, jQuery Fancybox, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on social services for disabled persons in the Moravskoslezský region.
  3. Good presence of contact information and social media links.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or suspicious content.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET WebForms platform with Kentico CMS, utilizing popular front-end libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Slider for UI components. The site loads asynchronously Google Tag Manager scripts for analytics and marketing. The design is responsive and accessible, with features like font size adjustment and high contrast mode. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and deferred script loading. The site uses Typekit fonts and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities exist by migrating to more modern frameworks and enhancing security headers. No critical technical risks were identified that would impact business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sirius-opava.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sirius-opava.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.