Skip to main content

Security report for sirin.eu

Sirin · Real Estate · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sirin is a prominent real estate developer specializing in sustainable logistics parks in the Baltic region, positioning itself as one of the largest players in this niche market. The company emphasizes energy efficiency and sustainability, having developed over 600,000 square meters of modern logistics real estate. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress, incorporating modern SEO and marketing tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Omnisend. Cookie consent is managed through Cookiebot, indicating attention to privacy compliance, although explicit privacy and terms of service documents are not readily found. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enabled and no evident vulnerabilities, but the absence of security headers and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience, supporting the company's credibility and market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sirin.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sirin operates in the real estate and transportation sectors, focusing on logistics infrastructure development. Its business model revolves around developing, managing, and leasing sustainable logistics parks, targeting businesses requiring modern and energy-efficient warehousing and distribution facilities. The company’s market position as a leading Baltic developer is supported by its extensive portfolio and long-standing market presence. The website’s content and structure indicate a focus on B2B clients in the logistics and supply chain industries. While the company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools, it lacks publicly visible detailed business registrations or certifications on the website. The absence of explicit contact details may limit direct customer engagement but aligns with privacy practices common in European markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data detected. The use of Cookiebot for cookie consent reflects GDPR awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The absence of explicit privacy and terms of service documents may expose the company to compliance risks under GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including security and incident response contacts to facilitate communication and compliance.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sirin
Description
Mes – vienas didžiausių logistikos nekilnojamojo turto vystytojų Baltijos šalyse. Rinkoje sėkmingai veikdami daugiau nei 15 metų, išplėtojome virš 600 000 kv. m modernių, energiškai efektyvių ir tvarių logistikos parkų.
Key services
Development of modern logistics parks, Energy-efficient and sustainable real estate solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Omnisend
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Omnisend
Marketing tools
Omnisend
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy restrictions
  3. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or linked pages
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content
  7. Website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found
  10. Content is in Lithuanian language with alternate English version available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using up-to-date plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. It employs jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing automation. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred CSS. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced frameworks beyond WordPress are used. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility compliance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sirin.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sirin.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.