a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 19 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
33
Not counted
Email security: did not complete in this scan.
DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention sinfulgroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for sinfulgroup.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Sinful Group operates a competitive e-commerce business in the sexual wellness retail sector, targeting consumers seeking sex toys and related products. Their business model includes online sales supported by physical stores in multiple European countries, indicating a broad market reach. The company emphasizes customer education and satisfaction as competitive advantages. Press coverage and testimonials support their market position. The presence of multiple country-specific domains suggests a well-established partnership ecosystem and regional market penetration. Growth indicators include record financial results and expansion plans. The company culture values dedication and continuous learning, supporting sustainable growth.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents gaps that could be exploited. No incident response or security policy information is published, which may hinder transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Sinful Group ApS
Description
Sinful Group ApS operates a chain of online sex shops focused on providing sex toys and related products to enhance pleasure and happiness. They emphasize customer education and satisfaction and are the largest sex toy retailer in Scandinavia.
Key services
Online retail of sex toys, Customer advice and education, Physical retail stores across Europe
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Marketing tools
Teamtailor jobs widget
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content.
No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
Contact information is clearly provided including emails and phone numbers.
Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Analytics.
No security policy or incident response information published.
Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Multiple country-specific domains linked indicating broad European presence.
No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sinfulgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sinfulgroup.com.