Skip to main content

Security report for simply2let.com

Simply 2 Let Limited · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Simply 2 Let Limited is a small, established property letting and management company based in Great Yarmouth, UK. The company provides dedicated services to landlords and tenants, focusing on local lettings and property management. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact details and service descriptions. The business appears to have been founded around 2017, aligning with the website's published content dates. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Cookie Consent, with integration of Google Maps API for location services. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate with no major technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks important security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, impacting the overall trustworthiness of the domain. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security practices and verification of domain registration to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching simply2let.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Simply 2 Let Limited operates in the Real Estate sector, targeting landlords and tenants in the Great Yarmouth area. Their business model centers on providing letting and property management services, supplemented by a landlord advertising service. The company maintains a local market position with a small business size. Revenue streams likely derive from property management fees and advertising services. The website shows no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries beyond a web design partner. Growth indicators include regular property listings and updated content. Strategic observations suggest a focus on local market penetration and service quality.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity level is basic, suitable for a small business but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against web vulnerabilities.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  3. Publish a dedicated privacy policy page and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish an incident response contact or security policy page to improve security posture and readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Simply 2 Let Limited
Registration number
07902746
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Simply 2 Let Limited
Description
Simply2Let situated in Great Yarmouth provides dedicated lettings and property management services to both landlords and tenants looking to rent in Great Yarmouth and the surrounding areas.
Key services
Letting services, Property management, Landlord advertising service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Maps API, Contact Form 7, Cookie Consent plugin, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Contact forms use Contact Form 7 plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on local property letting and management services.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No privacy policy page explicitly found but cookie policy page is present and includes consent mechanism.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain may not be registered, which is a significant concern.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Maps integration.
  8. No social media links found on the homepage or footer.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond basic plugins.
  10. Security headers are not detected in the HTML content; SSL is enabled.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins including Contact Form 7 for forms and a cookie consent plugin for privacy compliance. It integrates Google Maps API for location services and uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt observed. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small local business but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and domain management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with simply2let.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review simply2let.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.