Skip to main content

Security report for silverpear.co.uk

The Silver Pear · Retail · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Silver Pear is a UK-based retail or e-commerce business operating on a WordPress platform with WooCommerce and Elementor. The website presents a basic but functional online presence targeting general consumers in the UK. The technical infrastructure is standard for small to medium e-commerce sites, leveraging popular CMS and plugins. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or advanced protections, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The domain is well-established, registered since 2000 with a reputable UK registrar, indicating legitimacy and stability. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching silverpear.co.uk

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the retail sector with an e-commerce model, likely selling products online to UK customers. The long domain age suggests a stable operation, but the lack of detailed business information, contact details, and trust indicators limits visibility into market positioning and competitive advantages. The use of standard WordPress e-commerce tools indicates a focus on cost-effective digital presence. Absence of certifications or security policies suggests a small to medium enterprise with limited formal compliance or security investments. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic and lacks several critical elements. There are no visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which are essential for mitigating common web attacks. The SSL configuration status is unknown but presumed present given the domain uses HTTPS. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are found, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site uses popular plugins and frameworks but no evidence of vulnerability management or secure coding practices is visible. Overall, the security maturity is low, posing moderate risk to user data and business reputation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS is properly configured and enforced across the entire site.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Silver Pear
Description
The Silver Pear appears to be a UK-based business, likely retail or e-commerce oriented, given the presence of shopping cart widgets and product search features. The exact business description is not explicitly stated in the provided content.
Key services
Online product sales, Customer support via website
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Font Awesome, jQuery
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content.
  4. Website uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a standard e-commerce setup.
  5. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics/tracking.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the provided data.
  7. WHOIS data shows a long-registered domain with a reputable registrar.
  8. Content is retail-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, a common and flexible e-commerce stack. It uses Font Awesome for icons and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a basic SEO setup. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen-reader text present but no detailed accessibility compliance. The hosting provider is 123-Reg Limited, a reputable UK registrar and hosting provider. The site uses standard fonts and scripts but lacks advanced security or performance enhancements. Technical debt may exist due to missing security headers and privacy compliance elements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with silverpear.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review silverpear.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.