Skip to main content

Security report for sil.lt

Sil · Retail · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sil.lt is an established Lithuanian e-commerce retailer specializing in sports and leisure footwear, apparel, and accessories for men, women, and children. The website offers a wide range of original branded products including Nike, adidas, Jordan, and Puma, positioning itself as a key player in the Lithuanian sports retail market. The business model focuses on online sales with fast delivery and a customer-friendly return policy, targeting sports enthusiasts and casual consumers alike. Technically, the site is built on Magento with a modern tech stack including RequireJS, jQuery, and multiple marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Criteo. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie settings, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response information is provided. Privacy compliance is partial; a cookie policy and consent mechanism exist, but no privacy policy page was detected in the analyzed content. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust analysis but the website content and branding appear consistent with a legitimate business. Overall, Sil.lt presents a professional e-commerce presence with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sil.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sil.lt operates in the retail sector focusing on sportswear and footwear, serving primarily the Lithuanian market with localized content and language. The company offers a broad portfolio of well-known brands and maintains multiple language store fronts indicating a regional expansion or partnership strategy. The business leverages digital marketing and retargeting tools extensively to drive sales and customer engagement. The absence of visible contact details and privacy policy may impact customer trust and compliance standing. The website's technical infrastructure is modern and scalable, supporting a medium-sized e-commerce operation. Strategic partnerships with brand manufacturers and marketing platforms enhance market reach. Growth potential exists through improved transparency and enhanced security measures.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure cookies, which are fundamental security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site lacks visible security policies or incident response contacts, which are important for handling security incidents and building trust. Privacy compliance is partial with cookie consent but missing a privacy policy page. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing missing headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear security contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy page and ensure it is easily accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability issues to improve domain trustworthiness and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sil
Description
Avalynė, apranga, aksesuarai vyrams, moterims ir vaikams! Originalios Nike, adidas, Jordan, Puma ir kt. prekės ⚡Greitas pristatymas ir didelis pasirinkimas!
Key services
Online retail of footwear, Clothing and accessories sales, Fast delivery, Free returns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Magento, RequireJS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Criteo, Glami pixel, Omnisend
Frameworks
Magento
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure cookies configured
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo
Tracking pixels
Glami pixel, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Omnisend
Marketing tools
Omnisend
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Lithuanian e-commerce platform specializing in sports and leisure footwear and apparel
  2. Content is rich with detailed product categories and brand listings
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. Privacy policy page not detected in the analyzed content
  5. Cookie policy and consent mechanism present and active
  6. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are used
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. WHOIS data unavailable or inaccessible, limiting domain trust analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magento CMS with a modern front-end stack including RequireJS and jQuery. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Criteo, and Omnisend for tracking and customer engagement. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, structured data (JSON-LD for organization), and hreflang tags for multilingual support. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience with opportunities for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sil.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sil.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.