Skip to main content

Security report for sibyl.it

Sibyl · Information technology and services · Italy

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
4of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sibyl.it

This scan found 8 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sibyl s.r.l. operates in the technology sector, focusing on system integration and enterprise software solutions. Its market positioning is that of a specialized innovation partner within the Italian market, supported by its affiliation with Kirey Group. The company targets B2B clients requiring advanced Industry 4.0 and Oracle-based solutions. Revenue streams likely derive from software product sales, integration services, and consulting. The partnership ecosystem includes Kirey Group and technology providers such as Oracle and Mapbox. Growth indicators include active recruitment and a portfolio of case histories. The company maintains a professional digital footprint with consistent branding and social media engagement, supporting its competitive advantage in the local technology integration market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and DNSSEC active, ensuring secure communications and domain integrity. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of secure forms for user data collection is noted, though the lack of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS is a gap. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with GDPR requirements. Incident response and security policy documentation are absent, which could impact readiness for security events. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and formalizing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish explicit terms of service and incident response policy pages to improve legal compliance and security transparency.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Establish a dedicated security contact channel (e.g., security@sibyl.it) and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sibyl s.r.l.
VAT number
IT 06626020967
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sibyl s.r.l.
Description
Sibyl s.r.l. is a technology company specializing in system integration solutions, offering products and services focused on Industry 4.0, Oracle EBS and OCI, and other software solutions. They provide innovation partnerships and have a portfolio of case histories and open job positions.
Key services
System integration, Industry 4.0 solutions, Oracle EBS and OCI products, HSE Ergo, RADOC, Software X
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Mapbox GL JS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Animate.css
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with password fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Italian with some English elements in code and metadata.
  3. Multiple modal forms collect user data including sign-up, sign-in, demo requests, and payment info.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in footer with good confidence of GDPR compliance.
  6. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and Twitter with official company accounts.
  7. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found in the content.
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data; recommend header implementation.
  10. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained with DNSSEC enabled and no privacy protection masking registrant.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sibyl.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sibyl.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.