Skip to main content

Security report for shokobox.lv

ShokoBox.lv · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ShokoBox.lv is a Latvian-based e-commerce platform specializing in original and personalized gift products, including corporate gifts, business gifts, and seasonal items such as Christmas and Valentine's Day gifts. The website targets both individual consumers and corporate clients, offering customized chocolate products and branded promotional items. The business operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors with a focus on the Latvian and Russian-speaking markets. Technically, the website is built on the OpenCart CMS platform and utilizes common front-end libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome. It integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, and enforces HTTPS for secure communications. However, the site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy e-commerce presence with moderate technical maturity and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shokobox.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche player in the personalized and corporate gift market in Latvia, leveraging online sales channels. Its business model is retail e-commerce with a focus on customized chocolate gifts and corporate branding solutions. The presence of partner links and payment gateway integrations indicates a collaborative ecosystem supporting payment processing and quality assurance. The target customer segments include both private consumers seeking unique gifts and businesses requiring branded promotional products. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear market focus. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded product offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. Forms lack visible anti-CSRF tokens, which could expose the site to cross-site request forgery risks. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential supply chain risks if not regularly audited. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by the presence of privacy policies, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may be a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small e-commerce site but requires enhancements to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  3. Introduce a clear cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ShokoBox.lv
Description
Online store specializing in original and personalized gifts including corporate gifts, business gifts, gifts for clients and partners, Christmas gifts, and gifts with custom images.
Key services
Personalized chocolate gifts, Corporate gifts with logos, Seasonal and holiday gifts, Online ordering and delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.1, Bootstrap 3.x, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Poptin pixel, Paysera quality sign scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of trusted third-party scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Poptin
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Poptin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian e-commerce store specializing in personalized and corporate gifts.
  2. Content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  4. Privacy and terms policies are present and accessible.
  5. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content.
  6. Phone contact number is clearly displayed in header and contact page.
  7. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  8. No explicit cookie consent banner detected.
  9. Site uses OpenCart CMS with common front-end libraries.
  10. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the OpenCart CMS platform, utilizing a combination of jQuery 2.1.1, Bootstrap 3.x, Font Awesome, and Owl Carousel for UI components and responsiveness. Google Fonts are used for typography. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Poptin for user engagement and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some modern security best practices. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small e-commerce operation but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shokobox.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shokobox.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.