Skip to main content

Security report for shawl-concept.com

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shawl-concept.com is a small boutique e-commerce website specializing in designer shawls and scarves from renowned designers and exclusive Latvian motifs. The site targets consumers interested in high-quality, designer fashion accessories and operates primarily in the retail sector. The business appears to be founded around 2020 and is based in Latvia, with clear contact information and social media presence enhancing its market credibility. Technically, the website uses AngularJS and Bootstrap frameworks, integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika, and implements a cookie consent banner indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, which are important for full GDPR compliance. Security-wise, the domain is registered with GoDaddy and locked against unauthorized changes, but DNSSEC is not enabled and no advanced security headers are detected, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the website is functional, professionally designed, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shawl-concept.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a niche online retailer focusing on designer shawls and scarves, leveraging partnerships with well-known designers and offering exclusive products with Latvian cultural motifs. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with an emphasis on quality and exclusivity. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers and promote products. The website content and structure support a straightforward shopping experience with product listings, search functionality, and contact forms. The company appears to be small in size, with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. The lack of privacy and terms policies may limit trust for privacy-conscious customers. The presence of multiple tracking tools suggests a focus on marketing and customer behavior analytics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. The domain is registered with standard protections against unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security maturity. Forms use POST methods and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. The cookie consent banner is a positive privacy feature. The site would benefit from implementing modern security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and privacy policies to improve compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and customer trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen site security.
  4. Add explicit HTTPS enforcement and verify SSL/TLS configuration for best practices.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information and consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Boutique presenting products of top designers worldwide including scarves and shawls from Joshua Ellis, Fraas, Nina Ruchkina, Bobrinskoy Art, Pavlovo Posad, Plat’oky, and exclusive Latvian motif scarves.
Key services
Sale of designer shawls and scarves, Information about shawls and designers, Online shopping and order placement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-app, ng-controller), jQuery (implied by $ usage), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Font Awesome, Bootstrap CSS, CookieConsent2
Frameworks
AngularJS, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Forms use POST method
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small boutique e-commerce site specializing in designer shawls.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some GDPR awareness.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  5. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are used, including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  6. No advanced security headers or policies detected in HTML content.
  7. Domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, indicating transparency.
  8. Website uses AngularJS and Bootstrap frameworks with moderate mobile optimization.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of AngularJS and Bootstrap frameworks, with external resources loaded from Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and CDNJS. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika, indicating a mature approach to user tracking and marketing. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting is likely through GoDaddy based on WHOIS data. The site uses cookie consent scripts to comply with privacy regulations. Technical debt includes use of older AngularJS framework and lack of modern security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be modernized and hardened for better security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shawl-concept.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shawl-concept.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.