Skip to main content

Security report for sharethemeal.org

ShareTheMeal · Non-profit · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ShareTheMeal is a well-established non-profit platform affiliated with the United Nations World Food Programme, focused on fighting global hunger through donations and fundraising campaigns. The website offers a professional, content-rich experience with clear calls to action for donations and detailed information about ongoing humanitarian projects worldwide. The platform supports multiple languages and is optimized for mobile and desktop users, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Remix, integrates analytics tools like Amplitude and Firebase, and is hosted on AWS, ensuring reliability and performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, although DNSSEC is not enabled and no visible cookie consent mechanism was detected, which could be improved for compliance. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the organization's profile, showing a long-standing presence since 2012. The site is trustworthy, safe, and professionally managed, making it a credible platform for charitable donations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sharethemeal.org

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sharethemeal.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sharethemeal.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on humanitarian aid and food security. It leverages a donation-based business model, engaging a global audience through mobile apps and web campaigns. ShareTheMeal benefits from its affiliation with the UN World Food Programme, enhancing its credibility and reach. The platform runs multiple targeted fundraising campaigns addressing emergencies, nutrition, and resilience projects across various countries. Its revenue streams primarily come from individual donations facilitated via the website and mobile applications. The presence of testimonials from public figures and transparent impact statistics supports donor confidence. The organization maintains partnerships with major app stores and social media platforms to maximize outreach. Growth indicators include a large supporter base and active fundraising goals. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining compliance with privacy regulations and enhancing security transparency to sustain trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive set of security headers including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Input forms appear secure with client-side validation. However, the absence of DNSSEC is a minor security gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, which could be a compliance and readiness gap. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site is secure for users and donors but could improve by publishing formal security policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user privacy transparency.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider adding verified phone contact numbers or live support channels to enhance user trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ShareTheMeal
Description
ShareTheMeal is a charitable platform operated by the United Nations World Food Programme that enables users to donate meals to people in need worldwide. It facilitates fundraising campaigns focused on emergency food aid, nutrition support, school meals, and resilience programs in various countries.
Key services
Donation facilitation, Fundraising campaigns, Mobile app for donations, Emergency food aid support, Nutrition and school feeding programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, CSS, Amplitude Analytics, Firebase, Stripe
Frameworks
Remix
Platforms
Web, Mobile (Android, iOS apps)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client-side input validation
  • Use of secure cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Amplitude, Firebase Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Amplitude
Marketing tools
Amplitude Analytics, Firebase Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained charity platform affiliated with the UN World Food Programme.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and includes multiple fundraising campaigns with detailed descriptions and impact statistics.
  3. Strong social media presence with verified accounts linked.
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious behavior.
  5. No visible phone contact numbers; contact primarily via email and web forms.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  7. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and the Remix framework, supported by a robust backend infrastructure hosted on AWS. It integrates third-party services such as Amplitude for analytics, Firebase for backend services, and Stripe for payment processing. The site is optimized for performance with preloading of fonts and images, responsive design for mobile and desktop, and accessibility considerations. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for organization and campaigns. The use of Contentful CMS allows for dynamic content management. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The site demonstrates good technical maturity and scalability suitable for a global non-profit platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sharethemeal.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sharethemeal.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.