Skip to main content

Security report for shaketonpolitique.org

Générations Futures · Non-profit · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shake Ton Politique is a French non-profit civic engagement platform operated by Générations Futures, focused on enabling citizens to participate in public health and environmental policy discussions. The website offers consultations, petitions, and interpellations to government officials and elected representatives at various levels. The platform is well-positioned in the niche of environmental advocacy and public policy engagement in France. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO and cookie consent, hosted with OVH and using Cloudflare DNS for performance and security. The security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements like DNSSEC and enhanced security headers are recommended. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, providing clear contact information and active social media presence. No adult or explicit content is present, making it safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shaketonpolitique.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on environmental and health policy advocacy. Its business model revolves around civic engagement and public participation in policymaking through digital tools. The platform targets environmentally conscious citizens and activists in France and Europe. The site benefits from partnerships with related advocacy sites and maintains a consistent brand identity. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants, supported by visible donation links. The presence of multiple languages indicates an intent to reach a broader European audience. The organization is relatively young (founded 2019) but shows growth through active campaigns and social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism implemented via tarteaucitron.js. The use of Cloudflare DNS adds a layer of DNS security and performance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting room for enhancement with headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Forms appear to be standard with no visible insecure inputs. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit advocacy site but can be strengthened to mitigate risks further.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to patch vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy policy with detailed data retention and processing information.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Générations Futures
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Générations Futures
Description
Un site utilisant Les sites de Générations Futures. The website provides a platform for citizens to voice opinions on public policies related to health and environment, enabling them to contact decision-makers, government officials, elected representatives, and candidates at local, national, and European levels.
Key services
Consultations, Interpellations, Petitions, News updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap CSS, Swiper.js, Magnific Popup, Tarteaucitron.js (cookie consent)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of security status flags in UI

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (gtag)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag)
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Tarteaucitron.js
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in French with multi-language support via WPML plugin.
  3. The site is a civic engagement platform focused on health and environmental policies.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and cookie consent.
  5. Clear contact information and social media presence enhance trust.
  6. No explicit or adult content detected; safe for general audiences.
  7. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and DNSSEC.
  8. Domain registration is consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and tarteaucitron.js for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The front-end leverages Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Hosting is managed by OVH with Cloudflare DNS, providing good infrastructure support. Performance is moderate with preloaded fonts and optimized images. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, enhancing usability. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple languages via WPML. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and well-maintained, suitable for the organization's goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shaketonpolitique.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shaketonpolitique.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.