Skip to main content

Security report for sgnahost.de

DPSG SG Nahost · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DPSG SG Nahost is a small non-profit organization focused on fostering connections and cultural exchange among scouts in the Middle East. The website serves as an informational and community hub, providing resources, tips, and updates about scouting adventures and partnerships in the region. The site is built on a WordPress platform with a modern but moderate technical infrastructure, leveraging common libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-targeted to its audience, though improvements in privacy compliance and security policies are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sgnahost.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sgnahost.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sgnahost.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche within the scouting and cultural exchange sector, targeting youth and scout groups interested in the Middle East. Its business model is non-profit and community-driven, relying on partnerships and volunteer engagement. The website content and blog indicate active community involvement and ongoing events. The partnership with sgnahost.koboldhoehle.de suggests a collaborative hosting or content sharing arrangement. The lack of commercial advertising or tracking tools aligns with the non-profit nature. Growth potential lies in expanding digital presence and enhancing compliance and security to build trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data exposure is evident. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices and formal policies to enhance resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish terms of service and security policy pages to increase transparency and user trust.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DPSG SG Nahost
Description
Die Website repräsentiert die SG Nahost des Internationalen Arbeitskreises der DPSG, die Pfadfinder*innen aus dem Nahen Osten vernetzt und Begegnungen fördert. Sie bietet Informationen zu Abenteuern, Begegnungen, Tipps zur Organisation und Finanzierung sowie Einblicke in Partnerverbände und das Team.
Key services
Vernetzung von Pfadfinder*innen im Nahen Osten, Organisation von Begegnungen und Abenteuern, Bereitstellung von Tipps zur Planung, Finanzierung und Durchführung, Informationen zu Partnerverbänden
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 3.3.6, Font Awesome 4.5.0, Owl Carousel 2.0.0, jQuery UI 1.13.3, Fancybox 3.3.5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of latest WordPress version

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit scouting group site focused on the Middle East.
  2. Content is in German and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email link.
  4. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML response headers (not provided but inferred).
  7. No cookie consent banner or mechanism present.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present.
  10. Site uses HTTPS with valid certificates.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with a classic theme (Illdy) and common front-end libraries such as Bootstrap 3.3.6, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 4.5.0, and Owl Carousel. The site is mobile responsive and has moderate performance. SEO is basic with meta tags and RSS feeds but could be improved with structured data and enhanced accessibility features. Hosting appears stable but no explicit provider information is available. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected, aligning with privacy-conscious design. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist in upgrading Bootstrap and Font Awesome versions and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sgnahost.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sgnahost.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.