Skip to main content

Security report for sgg-ssup.ch

SGG SSUP · Non-profit · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Schweizerische Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft (SGG SSUP) is a Swiss non-profit organization dedicated to promoting social cohesion within Switzerland. The website serves as an informational platform highlighting current topics relevant to their mission. The organization maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple social media channels and employs structured data to enhance search engine visibility. The business model focuses on community engagement and social welfare, targeting the general Swiss public. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for optimization and Gravity Forms for user interactions. Cookiebot is implemented for cookie consent management, complemented by Google Consent Mode to respect user privacy preferences. The site uses modern technologies including CDN services for images and analytics tools for visitor insights. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent blocking mechanisms, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of published security policies or incident response contacts, represent compliance and transparency gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or malware were detected, and the domain registration details align well with the organization's profile, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small non-profit entity. Strategic improvements in privacy documentation, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance compliance and user trust. The current risk level is moderate with no immediate critical issues identified.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sgg-ssup.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SGG SSUP operates as a non-profit entity focused on social cohesion in Switzerland, positioning itself as a community-oriented organization. Its competitive advantage lies in its established presence and clear mission. The business model is informational and advocacy-based, with no direct commercial revenue streams evident. The target audience includes Swiss residents interested in social welfare topics. The organization maintains active social media engagement, which supports outreach and partnership opportunities. Growth indicators are limited due to the non-profit nature, but the website's SEO and content strategy suggest ongoing efforts to maintain visibility. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. The use of Cookiebot with blocking mode and Google Consent Mode reflects awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of published privacy and security policies, absence of incident response contacts, and missing security headers reduce overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear compliance documentation to improve trust and readiness. Incident response readiness appears minimal due to lack of contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, processing, and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal disclaimers.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SGG SSUP
Description
Die Schweizerische Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft SGG setzt sich für den sozialen Zusammenhalt der Gesellschaft in der Schweiz ein.
Key services
Promoting social cohesion, Public awareness, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Gravity Forms, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sirv image CDN
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • Google Consent Mode configured

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, Vimeo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Yoast SEO and Gravity Forms
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization
  3. Multiple social media profiles linked (Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, LinkedIn)
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the content
  6. Strong use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and organization info
  7. Use of Google Consent Mode to manage user consent for analytics and ads
  8. No signs of malware or phishing detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Gravity Forms, and Cookiebot for consent management. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, with integration of Google Consent Mode to respect user privacy. Images are served via Sirv CDN, improving load times. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's goals but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more comprehensive privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sgg-ssup.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sgg-ssup.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.