Skip to main content

Security report for sfera.com

Sfera · Retail · Spain

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sfera is a retail fashion brand operating an online platform primarily targeting Spanish-speaking countries with some English-speaking markets. The website serves as a login and country selection portal for customers. The business model focuses on e-commerce sales of apparel and accessories. The website's market position appears established but lacks visible trust signals or detailed business information on the landing page. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Ensighten for tracking and tag management, with Akamai as a CDN provider. The site shows basic mobile optimization and moderate performance but lacks advanced SEO optimization due to restrictive meta robots tags. No CMS or specific frameworks were detected. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is accessible. The security posture is moderate but requires improvements in SSL configuration, header implementation, and privacy compliance. Overall, the site scores moderately low on AI scoring due to missing WHOIS data, lack of privacy policies, and poor SEO. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency with privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and verifying domain registration details to build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sfera.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sfera operates in the retail sector, focusing on fashion apparel e-commerce. The company targets a broad international audience, primarily Spanish-speaking countries, with some English-speaking markets included. The business model is direct-to-consumer online retail. The lack of visible contact information and business details on the landing page limits transparency. The use of multiple tracking and tag management tools indicates a focus on marketing and analytics. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual for a retail brand and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is available. The WHOIS data absence is a significant concern for domain legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site should implement security best practices including security headers, clear privacy policies, and domain registration transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies prominently on the website to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Enhance SEO by removing restrictive meta robots tags and improving metadata.
  5. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sfera
Description
Sfera is a retail brand focused on fashion apparel and accessories, targeting a broad consumer base primarily in Spanish-speaking countries and some English-speaking markets.
Key services
Fashion apparel sales, Online shopping platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Ensighten, Akamai
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ensighten
Marketing tools
Ensighten
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses multiple external tracking and tag management services.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  4. Website content is minimal and primarily a country/language selection login page.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are present on the landing page.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No explicit adult or questionable content detected.
  8. SEO optimization is poor due to meta robots tag set to NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Akamai CDN is used for content delivery, indicating a robust hosting infrastructure. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indicators. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO is negatively impacted by meta robots NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW tags. Accessibility features are minimal. There is no evidence of advanced security configurations or vulnerability mitigations in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sfera.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sfera.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.