Skip to main content

Security report for sencor.lt

Sencor · Retail · Lithuania

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sencor is a consumer electronics and home appliance brand with a strong online presence targeting consumers interested in televisions, audio-video equipment, kitchen appliances, and personal care products. The website is well-structured, multilingual, and provides comprehensive product categories and customer service information. The company appears to operate primarily in Lithuania and surrounding European markets, with a medium-sized business profile. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, and Kentico CMS, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers were detected, and privacy and cookie policies are not clearly presented. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sencor.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sencor operates in the retail sector focusing on consumer electronics and home appliances. The business model includes direct online sales and a dealer network, supported by multilingual websites for various countries. The company leverages brand recognition and product diversity as competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely include product sales and after-sales services. The target customers are general consumers seeking quality electronics and household appliances. The website indicates a mature market presence with consistent branding and product offerings. Partnerships and sister sites across Europe suggest a broad regional footprint. Growth indicators include frequent product updates and new collections. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved transparency in domain registration and enhanced privacy policies to align with GDPR requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries were identified. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and lack of incident response contact information indicate compliance gaps. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, which requires careful privacy management. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in formalizing security policies and enhancing technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response contact channel to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sencor
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sencor
Description
For your entertainment Sencor offers everything from televisions and tablets, to mobile phones and record players and MP3 players. Sencor opens up a new world of culinary delights with food processors and stick mixers.
Key services
Consumer electronics sales, Home and kitchen appliances, Customer service and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Slider, Bootstrap 4, Moment.js, RequireJS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or invalid for .lt domain
  4. Uses modern web technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data and footer
  7. Multi-language and multi-country presence indicated by alternate hreflang links
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. No visible security or incident response policies
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Kentico CMS platform, utilizing Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and RequireJS for modular JavaScript loading. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site features a rich product catalog with dynamic menus and multimedia content including images and videos. Performance is moderate with some use of lazy loading and responsive images. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data. The site is mobile optimized and supports multiple languages and regional domains. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sencor.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sencor.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.