Skip to main content

Security report for sencor.in

Sencor · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sencor is a consumer electronics and household appliances brand offering a wide range of products including televisions, audio-video equipment, kitchen appliances, and health and beauty devices. The company targets consumers seeking quality and design in everyday electronics and home appliances. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and a comprehensive product catalog, supporting a medium-sized retail business model primarily focused on the Czech Republic and surrounding European markets. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and appears to be built on Joomla CMS. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled but could be improved with additional security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is incomplete or privacy protected, which slightly reduces trust but does not negate the legitimacy of the active and content-rich website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sencor.in

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sencor.in, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sencor.in right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sencor holds a solid market position as a recognized brand in consumer electronics and household appliances across multiple European countries, as evidenced by multiple regional domains. The business model is retail-focused with a broad product portfolio catering to home entertainment, kitchen, household, health, and office sectors. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Luigisbox for enhanced user experience and tracking. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for compliance improvement. The company maintains consistent branding and provides structured contact information, supporting business credibility. The regional domain strategy indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem and localized market approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a missed opportunity to strengthen defenses against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a retail website but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies with dedicated contact channels to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Review WHOIS registration details to ensure accurate and consistent domain registration information is publicly available.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities proactively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sencor
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sencor
Description
For your entertainment Sencor offers everything from televisions and tablets, to mobile phones and record players and MP3 players. Sencor opens up a new world of culinary delights with food processors and stick mixers.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Luigisbox autocomplete, Slick slider, Bootstrap modal, Moment.js, Bootstrap Material Datepicker
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Luigisbox autocomplete
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product information
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  3. No visible contact forms for direct communication; contact info is provided in structured data
  4. No visible security or incident response policies
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a commercial site
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks
  7. Good SEO and metadata usage
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Joomla CMS platform utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Slick slider, Bootstrap modal, Moment.js, and Luigisbox autocomplete. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata implementation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of webp images for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical infrastructure supports a medium-sized retail operation with opportunities for modernization in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sencor.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sencor.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.