Skip to main content

Security report for sencor.eu

Sencor · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sencor is a consumer electronics and home appliances brand offering a broad portfolio of products including televisions, audio-video equipment, kitchen appliances, household devices, and health and beauty products. The company targets general consumers across multiple European markets, supported by localized websites in various languages. The website demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and a Joomla-based CMS. The site is well-structured with good navigation and mobile optimization, providing a professional user experience. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit privacy and terms of service pages indicate areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers and incident response information are missing. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sencor.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sencor.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sencor.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sencor operates as a medium-sized retail and brand manufacturer in the consumer electronics sector, with a strong presence in Central and Eastern Europe. The company leverages a multi-lingual web presence to reach diverse markets and offers a wide range of products from televisions to kitchen appliances and health devices. The business model focuses on direct consumer sales supported by customer service and product discovery. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests potential gaps in regulatory compliance or domain management practices. The company appears to maintain partnerships or sister sites in multiple countries, indicating a broad operational footprint. The website's use of modern marketing and analytics tools reflects a commitment to digital marketing and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading, which is positive for security. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits the company's readiness to handle security incidents transparently. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and potential privacy issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and clarifying domain registration details.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance security transparency.
  4. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data inconsistencies to improve domain registration trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sencor
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sencor
Description
Sencor offers a wide range of consumer electronics and home appliances including televisions, audio-video equipment, kitchen appliances, household devices, health and beauty products, office and cables, and more.
Key services
Consumer electronics sales, Customer support and service, Product information and discovery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Luigisbox autocomplete, jQuery (implied by slick slider usage), Slick slider, Bootstrap modal, Moment.js, RequireJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Luigisbox autocomplete
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available from .com registry, indicating possible privacy or registry anomaly
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No incident response or security contact information found
  9. No social media links explicitly found in provided HTML snippet
  10. Website targets European markets with multiple localized domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS and uses a modern JavaScript stack including RequireJS, Slick slider, Bootstrap modal, and Moment.js. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing scripts, indicating a mature approach to digital marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and good navigation structure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading of images. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. The lack of explicit security headers and privacy documentation represents technical debt that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional retail website but requires enhancements for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sencor.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sencor.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.