Skip to main content

Security report for sencor.by

Sencor · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sencor is a consumer electronics and home appliance brand with a dedicated Russian language website offering a broad product catalog including televisions, audio-video equipment, kitchen appliances, health and beauty products, and office supplies. The site targets Russian-speaking consumers and provides dealer location and customer support information. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack with Google Tag Manager, slick slider, and likely Joomla CMS, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit privacy policies are lacking. The WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy, but the professional site and contact info mitigate some risk. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sencor.by

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sencor.by, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sencor.by right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as an official regional portal for Sencor, a medium-sized retail brand in the consumer electronics sector. It supports a multi-country presence with alternate language sites, indicating a structured international market approach. The business model focuses on retail sales through dealers and direct product information dissemination. The presence of structured data and consistent branding suggests a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the absence of WHOIS data and privacy policies indicates areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The company appears to maintain a moderate level of digital maturity with room for enhanced security and privacy governance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating baseline security and monitoring practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies suggest limited advanced security measures. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency, policy publication, and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and transparency.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security readiness.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and improve privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sencor
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sencor
Description
Sencor offers a wide range of consumer electronics and home appliances including televisions, tablets, mobile phones, audio-video equipment, kitchen appliances, household appliances, health and beauty products, office supplies, and cables.
Key services
Product catalog and information, Dealer locator, Customer support, Product news and updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery (implied by slick slider usage), Slick Slider, Bootstrap Modal, Moment.js, RequireJS, Google Fonts, WebP image format support
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is suspicious.
  4. Site uses modern web technologies and good SEO practices.
  5. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is present.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided via structured data.
  8. No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Google Tag Manager, slick slider, Bootstrap modal, and moment.js, likely built on Joomla CMS. It supports WebP images for performance optimization and is mobile responsive. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and terms pages, indicating some technical debt in compliance and security governance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sencor.by. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sencor.by.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.