Skip to main content

Security report for selflogistic.lv

SELF Loģistika SIA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SELF Loģistika SIA is a Latvian logistics and transportation company providing services such as round timber transportation and procurement. The website is built on WordPress and features a gallery showcasing their services. The company targets businesses and individuals in need of logistics solutions within Latvia. The site presents a professional design with clear navigation and contact information, supporting moderate trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses standard WordPress plugins and jQuery but lacks advanced performance or accessibility optimizations. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers or privacy policies, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved to verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and informative but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching selflogistic.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector with a focus on timber logistics. It appears to be a small-sized local business with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. The business model is service-oriented, targeting local clients requiring transport and logistics services. The website content and structure suggest a stable but modest market position without extensive digital marketing or analytics integration. Partnerships include the website design company Interum Technologies. The absence of privacy and security policies indicates potential compliance gaps. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. It lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and no HTTPS verification was possible from the provided data. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting the company's ability to handle security incidents effectively. The WHOIS data unavailability further reduces trust in domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all site content is served securely.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish an incident response plan and publish contact information for security issues or abuse reports.
  5. Regularly monitor and update WordPress and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SELF Loģistika SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SELF Loģistika SIA
Description
Loģistika & Transports
Key services
Apaļkoksnes transportēšana, Apaļkoksnes iepirkšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Envira Gallery plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based logistics company site with a gallery of services.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information including phone numbers, email, and physical address is clearly provided in the footer.
  4. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the HTML content.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond WordPress core scripts.
  6. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection forms present.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; unable to verify domain registration details.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site content is accessible and complete.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.0.1 using the Mystique theme and Envira Gallery Lite plugin for image galleries. It uses jQuery 3.6.0 and jQuery Migrate 3.3.2. The site loads multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript files for UI effects and gallery functionality. Performance is moderate with 57 queries in 0.26 seconds, indicating reasonable backend efficiency. Mobile optimization is basic, with no explicit responsive meta tags detected. SEO is basic with meta description and canonical link present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with selflogistic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review selflogistic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.