Skip to main content

Security report for seifs.lv

SEIFS.LV - Lielākais seifu interneta veikals · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SEIFS.LV is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in the sale of safes for homes, offices, weapons, and hotels. It positions itself as the largest online safe store in Latvia, offering a wide range of products including fireproof, waterproof, furniture, and office safes. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, providing detailed product information and pricing. Technically, it uses modern frameworks such as Alpine.js and Laravel Livewire, and integrates analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Ahrefs Analytics with privacy-conscious consent settings. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers in place, though explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not detected in the provided content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site appears trustworthy and professional but would benefit from clearer privacy disclosures and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seifs.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention seifs.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for seifs.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector, targeting customers in Latvia including homeowners, businesses, hunters, and hospitality providers. Its competitive advantage lies in a broad product catalog certified to European standards (ECB-S) and localized delivery services. The business model is direct online sales with a focus on security products. Partnerships with related equipment suppliers (insafe.lv) and an English language sister or partner site (safes24.com) suggest a regional ecosystem. The company maintains a consistent brand and good content quality, supporting a medium-sized operation. Lack of visible company registration or VAT information in the content limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and denial of tracking cookies by default via Google Consent Mode. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML snapshot. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms reduces transparency. The site would benefit from publishing these policies and providing security contact channels to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved with formal documentation and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Add clear company contact information including email and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  3. Implement and disclose an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying security certifications or trust badges to increase customer confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SEIFS.LV - Lielākais seifu interneta veikals
Description
Plašs seifu klāsts mājai, birojam, ieročiem un viesnīcām. Ugunsdroši, ūdensizturīgi, mēbeļu seifi ar piegādi Rīgā un Latvijā. Pasūtiet tagad!
Key services
Sale of safes for home, office, weapons, hotels, Delivery in Riga and Latvia, Wide product range including fireproof, waterproof, furniture safes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, Livewire, Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs Analytics
Frameworks
Laravel Livewire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Error handling script to reload on certain JS errors
  • Consent mode set to deny ad_storage, analytics_storage, personalization_storage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform selling safes in Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured with detailed product information and pricing.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms pages found in the provided HTML snapshot.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snapshot.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools with consent mode denying tracking by default.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Alpine.js for reactive UI components and Laravel Livewire for server-driven frontend interactions. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Ahrefs Analytics for tracking and SEO insights, with consent mode configured to deny tracking by default, reflecting privacy awareness. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and structured data for SEO. Performance is moderate with preloading of CSS and JS assets. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Error handling scripts improve robustness. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for improvement in accessibility and explicit privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seifs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seifs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.