Skip to main content

Security report for seakeeper.com

Seakeeper Inc. · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Seakeeper Inc. is a recognized leader in marine motion control technology, specializing in gyroscopic stabilizers and vessel attitude control systems that enhance boating experiences worldwide. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting boating enthusiasts and professionals. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics, hosted on a WordPress CMS platform with embedded Vimeo videos for rich media content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for improved compliance and protection. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not negate the evident legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website is well-structured, content-rich, and professionally maintained, supporting a medium-sized enterprise in the transportation sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seakeeper.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention seakeeper.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
19
Employees
0
Customers
19
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
21%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for seakeeper.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Seakeeper holds a strong market position as a world leader in marine motion control technology, focusing on innovative products that eliminate boat roll and pitch. Their business model centers on manufacturing and selling advanced marine stabilizers and control systems, targeting both new and experienced boaters. The company maintains a robust digital presence with active social media channels and multimedia content to engage customers. While direct contact information is limited on the main site, the presence of privacy and terms pages indicates a degree of corporate governance. The company appears to operate in the transportation sector with a medium-sized organizational footprint. Strategic partnerships or product extensions are evident through related domains such as ride.seakeeper.com. The lack of WHOIS transparency suggests a need for further verification but does not detract significantly from their market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The site also lacks a cookie consent mechanism, impacting GDPR compliance. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising pixels increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were detected, improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency are recommended to enhance the security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Review WHOIS registration details to ensure transparency and improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seakeeper Inc.
Description
Seakeeper is the world leader in marine motion control technology, completely transforming the boating experience for new and experienced boaters alike.
Key services
Gyroscopic Stabilizers, Vessel Attitude Control Systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Vimeo embedded videos, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords, DoubleClick, Simpli.fi, Adelphic
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Simpli.fi, Adelphic Universal Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust slightly.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present but cookie consent is missing.
  5. Extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising pixels.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms detected on the main page for data collection.
  8. Social media presence is strong with multiple official channels linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with integration of modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Embedded Vimeo videos provide rich media content enhancing user engagement. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and no visible DNSSEC information. The absence of WHOIS data suggests potential registrar or privacy protection issues. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seakeeper.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seakeeper.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.