Skip to main content

Security report for scorpioco.com

D.E. Scorpio Corporation · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

D.E. Scorpio Corporation is a medium-sized, established construction firm founded in 2013, specializing in commercial general contracting with a community-centered and sustainable approach. Their website showcases a professional portfolio of projects and emphasizes quality, safety, and innovative construction management services. The company targets commercial clients and public sector entities, positioning itself as a trusted regional construction partner. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, delivering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain protections but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scorpioco.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scorpioco.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for scorpioco.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and construction sector, offering full-service contracting including design-build and construction management at risk. Their business model focuses on delivering sustainable and community-beneficial buildings. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement and a solid market position. Revenue streams likely derive from commercial and public construction projects. The absence of privacy policies and incident response information suggests an opportunity to enhance compliance and trust. The company maintains certifications and a consistent brand identity, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes, indicating good baseline security. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as CSP or HSTS reduces overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Forms are protected with honeypot fields, reducing spam risk. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve browser security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
D.E. Scorpio Corporation
Registration number
CGC 061834
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
D.E. Scorpio Corporation
Description
Scorpio is a devoted and seasoned team of construction professionals who build to enliven communities and beautify cities. They provide commercial general contracting services including Construction Management at Risk, Design-Build, and Competitive Hard-Bid Procurement Process. They focus on sustainable solutions and delivering buildings that bring enduring benefit to users.
Key services
Commercial General Contracting, Construction Management at Risk, Design-Build, Competitive Hard-Bid Procurement, Cost Management, Quality Management, Schedule Management, Jobsite Safety, Sustainable Construction Practices, Building Information Modeling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Gravity Forms, Elementor, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with SSL
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security nonce in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Analytics by MonsterInsights, Gravity Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone links.
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  5. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  7. Domain is well-registered and not privacy protected, indicating transparency.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Forms use Gravity Forms with anti-spam honeypot fields.
  10. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Gravity Forms for data collection. It integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking and uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is standard for professional corporate websites, with opportunities to improve security configurations and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scorpioco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scorpioco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.