Skip to main content

Security report for schweizer-auto-des-jahres.ch

Ringier AG · Transportation · Switzerland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Schweizer Auto des Jahres 2026' is a professionally developed media platform operated under the Ringier AG umbrella, focused on hosting a public voting event for the Swiss Car of the Year award. It targets Swiss automotive consumers and enthusiasts, offering a contest with prizes and leveraging partnerships with prominent Swiss media outlets. The platform demonstrates a solid market position within the niche automotive media event sector. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, OneTrust for cookie consent, and Amazon advertising services, ensuring a good level of digital maturity and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, appropriate security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies linked via the parent company domains, alongside a functional consent mechanism. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front with good SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schweizer-auto-des-jahres.ch

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a media event platform leveraging public engagement through voting and contests, supported by advertising and media partnerships. Its competitive advantage lies in its association with Ringier AG and established Swiss media brands, providing credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsorships, and promotional partnerships. The target customer segment is Swiss automotive consumers interested in new car models and awards. Growth indicators include active media partnerships and ongoing contest engagement. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving major Swiss media outlets and advertising networks, enhancing market presence and promotional capabilities.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of a reputable cookie consent management platform (OneTrust). No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information represents a compliance gap. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could improve in formalizing incident response and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance visibility of contact information for user support and compliance inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ringier AG
Description
A Swiss automotive award platform allowing public voting for the 'Swiss Car of the Year 2026' with prizes and media partnerships.
Key services
Public voting platform for car awards, Promotional contests with prizes, Media partnership and advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Amazon APS (Advertising), Prebid.js, Google Publisher Tags, SEOmatic
Frameworks
OneTrust CMP
Platforms
Ringier Media Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSP and other headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, Amazon APS, Yieldlove, Ringier Advertising
Tracking pixels
OneTrust CMP
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed media event platform for Swiss automotive awards.
  2. Strong use of cookie consent and privacy compliance tools.
  3. Multiple media partners and sponsors are clearly displayed.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site; contact likely via parent company Ringier.
  5. Use of modern advertising and analytics technologies.
  6. No security or privacy policy pages explicitly labeled as such on main domain but linked via Ringier domains.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. Advertising is managed via Google Ad Manager and Amazon APS, indicating a sophisticated monetization strategy. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts and video content. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears to be a custom or proprietary Ringier platform. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on multiple external ad and tracking services which require ongoing monitoring for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schweizer-auto-des-jahres.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schweizer-auto-des-jahres.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.