Skip to main content

Security report for schindler.in

Schindler India · Transportation · India

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Schindler India is a leading enterprise specializing in the manufacturing, installation, and maintenance of elevators, escalators, and moving walks. The company leverages Swiss engineering excellence to provide safe, comfortable, and efficient urban mobility solutions tailored for residential, commercial, and public transit sectors. Their market position is strong, supported by a comprehensive portfolio of products and modernization services, digital connectivity solutions, and a global brand presence under the Schindler Group umbrella. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure, utilizing Adobe Experience Manager CMS, HubSpot, Adobe Analytics, and Google Analytics for marketing and user engagement. Security posture is robust with HTTPS and a detailed Content Security Policy, though some CSP directives could be tightened to reduce risk. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, supporting Schindler's reputation as a global leader in urban mobility solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schindler.in

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Schindler India operates within the transportation and manufacturing sectors, focusing on vertical and horizontal mobility products. Their business model integrates product sales with long-term service contracts including maintenance and modernization, supplemented by digital services that enhance equipment connectivity and performance monitoring. The company targets building owners, facility managers, architects, and urban developers, emphasizing safety, efficiency, and sustainability. Their competitive advantage lies in Swiss engineering quality, a broad product range, and digital innovation such as Schindler PORT and Ahead digital services. The website's extensive content and global language support indicate a strategic focus on international and local markets. Partnerships with digital planning platforms and use of advanced analytics tools reflect a data-driven approach to customer engagement and market expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive Content Security Policy that restricts sources for scripts, styles, images, and connections. The CSP includes many trusted third-party domains but allows 'unsafe-inline' scripts, which could be a vector for cross-site scripting attacks. No security.txt or explicit incident response information is published, which limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts, increasing the attack surface and requiring vigilant monitoring. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by tightening CSP rules, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Remove or minimize 'unsafe-inline' in Content Security Policy to reduce XSS risk.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts.
  3. Implement a security.txt file at the root domain for standardized vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Schindler India
Description
Schindler India provides Swiss-engineered elevators, escalators, and moving walks designed for safety, comfort, and efficiency in urban environments. They offer products for residential, commercial, and public transit applications, along with modernization, maintenance, and digital services.
Key services
Passenger elevators, Freight and special elevators, Escalators and moving walks, Modernization and upgrades, Maintenance and customer support, Digital services and connectivity solutions, Career opportunities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Adobe Launch, Bing Ads, TikTok embeds, Vimeo player
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager, HubSpot
Platforms
Adobe Experience Cloud, HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Content Security Policy with detailed directives
  • No inline scripts without nonce or hash but some 'unsafe-inline' allowed in CSP
  • No object-src allowed
  • Base URI restricted to self

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Adobe Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Adobe Experience Cloud, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive product and service information available
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Good security posture with room for CSP improvements
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant
  8. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the main HTML content but contact page likely contains them
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, integrated with HubSpot for marketing automation and Adobe Analytics for performance tracking. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and screen reader support. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and canonical links. Hosting details are not explicit but the presence of Adobe Experience Cloud scripts suggests enterprise-grade hosting. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple third-party scripts and rich media content. Technical risks include reliance on numerous external domains and the use of 'unsafe-inline' scripts in CSP. Opportunities exist to streamline scripts and enhance security headers for improved resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schindler.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schindler.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.