Skip to main content

Security report for schindler.be

Schindler België · Transportation · Belgium

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Schindler België is a regional branch of the global Schindler Group, specializing in the manufacturing, installation, and maintenance of elevators, escalators, and moving walkways. The company positions itself as a leader in urban mobility solutions, offering innovative and efficient products tailored for the Belgian market. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, service offerings, and localized content. Technically, the site leverages Adobe Experience Manager as its CMS, integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools, and implements robust privacy and consent management frameworks. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and a strict Content Security Policy, although some inline script allowances could be tightened. The WHOIS data is restricted by registry policy, which is common for large enterprises and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates professionalism, compliance with GDPR, and a solid technical foundation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schindler.be

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Schindler België operates within the transportation sector, focusing on vertical and horizontal urban mobility solutions. Their business model includes product sales, modernization, and maintenance services, targeting building owners, architects, and facility managers. The company benefits from the global brand strength of Schindler Group and maintains a consistent brand identity across multiple country domains. The website's extensive multilingual support and regional adaptations indicate a strategic approach to market penetration and customer engagement. Partnerships and digital tools like the 'digitalplan.schindler.com' platform enhance their service ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a preference for controlled lead generation via contact forms and regional offices.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, a comprehensive Content Security Policy, and integration of consent management tools to comply with privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the CSP includes 'unsafe-inline' for scripts and styles, which could be a potential risk vector and should be reviewed. The lack of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for enterprises but reduces visibility into domain registration details. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Review and restrict 'unsafe-inline' usage in Content Security Policy to reduce XSS risks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing direct company contact emails and phone numbers for customer support.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance and minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Schindler België
Description
De Zwitserse liften, roltrappen en rolpaden van Schindler houden de stedelijke wereld 24/7 wereldwijd bewegend, veilig, comfortabel en efficiënt.
Key services
Elevator manufacturing, Escalator and moving walkway manufacturing, Maintenance and modernization services, Digital media services for elevators
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Adobe Launch (Tag Manager), Google Tag Manager, HubSpot scripts, OneTrust cookie consent, jQuery, Vimeo player, TikTok embeds, LinkedIn platform, Twitter platform, YouTube embeds
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager, OneTrust Consent Framework
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy with strict directives
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No inline scripts except allowed unsafe-inline for styles/scripts
  • No object-src allowed

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads
Tracking pixels
Adobe Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Leadinfo, OneTrust, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Adobe Experience Cloud, OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and consent management
  3. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected
  4. WHOIS data is restricted by registry policy
  5. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms present
  6. No suspicious or malicious domains linked
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms including Adobe Launch, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and OneTrust for consent management. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and social media integration. Performance is moderate, likely due to the extensive use of third-party scripts and rich media content. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, providing a good user experience across devices. The technical stack is modern and enterprise-grade, though continuous performance tuning and security hardening are recommended to maintain optimal operation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schindler.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schindler.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.