Skip to main content

Security report for scanpanel.lv

Scanpanel SIA · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanpanel SIA is a Latvian manufacturing company specializing in sandwich panels used for trailers and refrigerated truck bodies. Founded in 2013, it builds upon over 25 years of experience from its Norwegian predecessor Selcotek AS. The company targets transportation and manufacturing sectors requiring insulated vehicle bodies and repair services. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins and technologies, providing a professional and navigable user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and privacy policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is business-focused, safe, and moderately mature digitally.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scanpanel.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scanpanel.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for scanpanel.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scanpanel operates in a niche manufacturing market with a focus on insulated panels for transportation vehicles. Its competitive advantage lies in legacy expertise and regional presence in Latvia and Norway. The business model centers on manufacturing and supplying sandwich panels and repair services. The company maintains partnerships with related firms Norplast SIA and Norpartners AS. The website content and contact details support a credible small business profile, though lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates room for compliance improvement. The use of Piwik analytics suggests moderate user tracking with some privacy considerations.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options which are recommended for enhanced protection. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML. Absence of privacy and cookie policies and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. The site uses standard WordPress plugins which should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, security maturity is moderate but can be improved with policy additions and header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information including security contact emails.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Scanpanel SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scanpanel SIA
Description
Scanpanel SIA, founded in 2013, is a manufacturer of sandwich panels used primarily for trailers and refrigerated truck bodies. The company continues the legacy of Norwegian Selcotek AS with over 25 years of experience in sandwich panel production. Their products consist of composite panels with glass fiber sheets and thermal insulation, serving the transportation and repair sectors. The owners are also involved in related companies Norplast SIA (Latvia) and Norpartners AS (Norway).
Key services
Manufacture of sandwich panels, Supply for trailers and refrigerated truck bodies, Repair services for insulated vehicle bodies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Revolution Slider, Visual Composer, qTranslate-X
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Website uses WordPress with common plugins and standard technologies.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. Piwik analytics is used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  8. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  10. External links include partner companies and common CDN/font providers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins such as Revolution Slider and Visual Composer, using jQuery and Bootstrap 3.3.7 for frontend functionality. Performance is moderate with standard CDN usage for fonts and scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but basic. The technical stack is common and stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scanpanel.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scanpanel.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.