Skip to main content

Security report for scandium.ee

Scandium Kinnisvara AS · Real Estate · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scandium Kinnisvara AS is a medium-sized Estonian real estate developer specializing in residential, rental, and commercial property development with a focus on quality and sustainability. The company operates notable projects such as the Marienholm peninsula development in Haapsalu and also engages in energy projects under Scandium Energia. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information and active content updates, positioning the company as a credible player in the Estonian real estate market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern libraries and analytics tools, ensuring a good user experience and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA protection on forms, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy or security policies. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and professional business with room for enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scandium.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scandium.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for scandium.ee right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets real estate investors, tenants, and home buyers in Estonia, leveraging a business model focused on property development and management. Their market position is strengthened by large-scale projects and a clear brand presence. Revenue streams likely include property sales, rentals, and energy-related services. The website's multilingual support and active news section indicate growth orientation and customer engagement. Partnerships with architects and use of modern technologies suggest a competitive advantage. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies may impact trust among privacy-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting form submissions. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing explicit security headers, and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing comprehensive security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing incident response contacts to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy, security, and incident response policies on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and privacy compliance documentation to build user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Scandium Kinnisvara AS
Registration number
12957803
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scandium Kinnisvara AS
Description
Scandium Kinnisvara is a real estate developer focused on creating inspiring living spaces, office buildings, and rental properties with an emphasis on quality and sustainability. They develop residential, commercial, and energy projects, including large-scale developments like Marienholm in Haapsalu.
Key services
Residential property development, Rental property management, Commercial office space development, Energy projects (Scandium Energia)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Ninja Forms, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, AniJS, Fancybox
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with integrity attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes (cookie consent)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Multiple language support (Estonian, Russian, English)
  3. Active blog/news section with recent updates
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. No explicit privacy or security policies found on site
  6. Cookie consent implemented via CookieYes
  7. Contact information clearly displayed including email and physical address
  8. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Ninja Forms for data collection. It uses AniJS for animations, Fancybox for media display, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking. The site is hosted likely by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Some technical debt is noted in missing DNSSEC and security headers. The site is well-structured with JSON-LD structured data and Open Graph tags for social media integration, supporting good search engine visibility and social sharing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scandium.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scandium.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.