Skip to main content

Security report for sbeawards.com

Smart Built Environment Awards · Real Estate · United Arab Emirates

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Smart Built Environment Awards website serves as a professional platform to recognize excellence in the built environment sector, focusing on property management, community management, facilities management, and PropTech. The site is positioned as a regional leader in its niche, offering nomination, sponsorship, and event booking services. The business targets industry professionals and stakeholders primarily in the UAE and surrounding regions. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI libraries, with integration of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and presents a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and does not provide visible privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims and shows no suspicious patterns.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sbeawards.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the real estate and hospitality sectors, organizing annual awards that have grown to their fifth edition. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, event ticket sales, and nomination fees. The company maintains partnerships with related entities such as Built Environment ME and Media Fusion ME, enhancing its market reach. The website content and sponsor logos indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a professional brand presence. The lack of explicit legal and privacy documentation suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. The target customers are industry professionals and companies seeking recognition and networking opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or privacy policies are notable gaps. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts without a cookie consent mechanism raises privacy compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security management. The site should improve its security headers, enable DNSSEC, and implement privacy and cookie policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Conduct a security audit of all third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Smart Built Environment Awards
Description
The Smart Built Environment Awards recognize excellence and innovation in the built environment sector, including property management, community management, facilities management, and PropTech. The awards are in their fifth edition and position themselves as a pinnacle of industry recognition.
Key services
Awards nomination and recognition, Event hosting, Sponsorship opportunities, Table booking for events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Swiper, CubePortfolio, Magnific Popup, Google Maps API, WOW.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), Google Ads (AW-16645945049), Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company emails and phone numbers.
  4. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts without visible consent mechanisms.
  5. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.
  6. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business claims.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Multiple sponsor and partner logos indicate established business relationships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, enhanced by UI libraries like Swiper and CubePortfolio for interactive elements. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons. The site integrates Google Maps API and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom-built or proprietary platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sbeawards.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sbeawards.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.