Skip to main content

Security report for savitra.lv

SIA “SAVITRA” · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Savitra is a Latvian logistics and transportation company with over 30 years of experience serving multiple European countries. The company offers high-quality transport services focusing on efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring clear navigation and contact information including phone, email, and a contact form. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook supports their business outreach. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies but lacks some security headers and privacy policies, which are areas for improvement. The site is fully accessible with HTTPS enabled, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and security disclosures suggests gaps in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate small-sized business with a solid market position in the transportation sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching savitra.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Savitra operates as a B2B logistics provider targeting companies across nine European countries. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence and investment in technology and process optimization. The business model focuses on transport coordination, fleet management, and project management services. The company maintains a professional online presence with named board members and clear business registration details, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include a diversified geographic footprint and a modernized fleet. Partnerships and social media engagement indicate active market participation. However, the lack of detailed privacy and security policies may affect trust with privacy-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness signals. The site uses reputable plugins like Jetpack and Elementor but should ensure these are kept up to date to mitigate risks. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms, which may expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is basic and could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “SAVITRA”
Registration number
40103003876
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “SAVITRA”
Description
Savitra is a 30-year leader in logistics and transportation serving well-known companies across 9 European countries with efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. They focus on high-level quality transport services and invest in technology and processes to provide excellent client experience.
Key services
Logistics, Transportation, Fleet management, Project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Font Awesome, MediaElement.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack, Elementor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Elementor builder and Jetpack plugin.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information present.
  7. Site content is professional and business-oriented with no adult or questionable content.
  8. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook confirmed.
  9. Site performance and mobile optimization are good but accessibility and SEO could be improved.
  10. Security headers are not detected; HTTPS is enabled.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and includes libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome. Jetpack plugin is used for analytics and social features. The site loads external resources from WordPress.com and Gravatar domains. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are present but could be expanded. No hosting provider information is directly discernible. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Technical debt appears low, but security and privacy technical implementations require enhancement to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with savitra.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review savitra.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.