Skip to main content

Security report for satelit.lv

"Satelits" SIA · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents "Satelits" SIA, a small retail business based in Riga, Latvia, operating a physical store at Pērnavas 52. The site provides basic contact information including phone numbers, fax, mobile, and an email address. The business model is traditional brick-and-mortar retail targeting local customers. The website is minimalistic with limited content and no advanced features such as forms or e-commerce capabilities. Technically, the site uses basic HTML with embedded Google Analytics for visitor tracking. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or advanced frameworks. The site lacks visible security headers and HTTPS status could not be confirmed from the data, indicating potential security weaknesses. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO features are minimal. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers, combined with missing privacy and cookie policies, suggests a low security posture and poor privacy compliance. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Overall, the website is functional for basic informational purposes but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trustworthiness and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching satelit.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector with a local market focus in Riga, Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in its physical store presence. The business model is straightforward retail sales without evident online commerce. Revenue streams are likely from in-store sales. The target customers are local residents. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries. The website's minimal content and lack of digital marketing tools suggest limited digital maturity and growth focus. The use of Google Analytics indicates some interest in visitor metrics but lacks privacy transparency.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low due to missing HTTPS, lack of security headers, and absence of privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Data protection practices are unclear, and no dedicated security contacts are listed. The use of Google Analytics without visible privacy compliance raises GDPR concerns. The site does not expose sensitive data or forms, reducing risk but also limiting functionality. Overall, the security posture requires urgent improvements to meet basic standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
"Satelits" SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
"Satelits" SIA
Description
Retail business located in Riga, Latvia, providing store services at Pērnavas 52 address with contact via phone and email.
Key services
Retail store services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple retail business page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, fax, mobile, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms or user input fields detected.
  5. Uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible privacy compliance.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and inline CSS styles, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It includes Google Analytics scripts for visitor tracking. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. The site is not evidently mobile responsive beyond basic scaling. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO optimization is basic with only a title tag present and no meta description or structured data. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with satelit.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review satelit.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.