Skip to main content

Security report for saronic.com

Saronic Technologies · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Saronic Technologies is a specialized technology company focused on providing naval and maritime forces with advanced Autonomous Surface Vessels. Their market position is that of a niche innovator delivering intelligent maritime solutions that enhance awareness, extend operational reach, and improve survivability in naval contexts. The company targets defense and maritime sectors with a business model centered on technology development and integration of autonomous systems for maritime superiority. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, incorporating Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security respectively. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, fast performance, and good SEO practices. However, some security best practices like security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot activity, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the professional web presence and active social media profiles support the company's credibility. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding terms of service, and clarifying contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saronic.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention saronic.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for saronic.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Saronic Technologies operates in the autonomous maritime technology sector, focusing on defense and naval applications. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering intelligent Autonomous Surface Vessels with advanced sensing, communication, and payload capabilities. The business model appears to be technology development and integration, targeting naval and maritime forces as primary customers. The company maintains a professional online presence with active recruitment efforts via Lever.co, indicating growth and talent acquisition focus. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The company is positioned as a small but innovative player in a specialized market niche with a strong emphasis on technology and operational superiority.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to prevent automated abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. The lack of contact information for security incidents is a gap. Overall, the security culture appears to be in early to intermediate stages, with clear opportunities for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a detailed cookie policy and implement a user consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user and business legal relationships.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information for general and security-related inquiries to enhance communication and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Saronic Technologies
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Saronic Technologies
Description
Providing naval and maritime forces with the most intelligent Autonomous Surface Vessels available.
Key services
Autonomous Surface Vessels, Maritime surveillance and reconnaissance, Payload integration for naval applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and navigation.
  2. Content focuses on autonomous maritime vessels for defense and maritime sectors.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or footer.
  4. Privacy policy is present but cookie policy and terms of service are missing.
  5. No visible forms collecting user data on the homepage.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants caution.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, ensuring a performant and responsive user experience. The use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager indicates a mature approach to user behavior tracking and marketing analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests some technical debt in security and privacy compliance areas. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the use of Next.js suggests a server-side rendering approach likely hosted on a scalable cloud platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saronic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saronic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.