Skip to main content

Security report for sanmarino.pe

San Marino · Real Estate · Peru

Critical risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

23/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

San Marino is a Peruvian real estate development specializing in luxury residential properties and marina services. The website presents a well-structured and visually appealing platform targeting buyers interested in exclusive homes, apartments, marina slips, and club memberships near Lima. The technical infrastructure relies on Apache and PHP 7.3 with integration of Google Tag Manager and TikTok Analytics for marketing and tracking purposes. However, the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate significantly undermines the site's security posture. Additionally, the lack of cookie consent mechanisms and comprehensive privacy compliance measures exposes potential regulatory risks. Overall, while the business model and market positioning are clear and credible, the website requires urgent security and privacy improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sanmarino.pe

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
23

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche luxury real estate and hospitality sector in Peru, offering a unique marina-based residential experience. Its competitive advantage lies in combining waterfront properties with premium club services. The business model focuses on direct sales of properties and memberships, supported by digital marketing tools. The target audience includes affluent individuals seeking vacation or permanent homes with nautical amenities. Growth potential is tied to the Peruvian real estate market and tourism trends. Partnerships with service providers and use of analytics indicate a moderate digital maturity. However, the lack of advanced security and privacy policies may impact customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the absence of HTTPS, no security headers, and missing cookie consent mechanisms despite active tracking scripts. While no known SSL vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the lack of encryption exposes users to data interception risks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR or similar regulations is minimal, increasing legal risk. Immediate remediation is required to install SSL, implement security headers, and establish privacy controls to safeguard user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner and privacy controls to comply with GDPR and other privacy laws.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional LAMP stack with Apache and PHP 7.3, which is somewhat outdated but functional. The front-end includes CSS and JavaScript with RequireJS for module loading. Performance metrics are missing, indicating a need for monitoring and optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO basics are present but could be improved. The use of Google Tag Manager and TikTok Analytics shows integration with modern marketing tools. Hosting appears to be managed via NS.RCP.NET.pe name servers, but no CDN or advanced hosting platform detected. Technical debt includes lack of HTTPS and missing security best practices, which pose operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 28/100High28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sanmarino.pe. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sanmarino.pe.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.