Sankt Oberholz is a Berlin-based real estate company specializing in flexible office rentals, coworking spaces, meeting rooms, and event locations. The company targets freelancers, self-employed professionals, teams, and companies seeking adaptable office solutions in Berlin. Their business model focuses on providing flexible rental periods and a variety of office sizes and event venues, positioning them as a key player in Berlin's coworking and office rental market. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with Gravity Forms for data collection and Borlabs Cookie for consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, integrated via Google's Site Kit plugin. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms in place; however, the absence of explicit privacy policies, security headers, and incident response information suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with clear business information and contact channels, but could enhance compliance and security transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
33
Average
44
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention sanktoberholz.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for sanktoberholz.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on flexible office and coworking spaces in Berlin. Their competitive advantage lies in flexible rental terms and a broad portfolio of office and event spaces. Revenue streams likely include office rentals, coworking memberships, event space bookings, and property management services for landlords. The target customer segments include freelancers, startups, SMEs, and event organizers. The presence of a consulting partner site indicates an extended service ecosystem. The website content and structured data reflect a well-established business with consistent branding and professional presentation, supporting growth and customer engagement.
Security posture
The website enforces HTTPS and uses consent checkboxes on forms, demonstrating awareness of data protection. Cookie consent is managed via Borlabs Cookie, enhancing GDPR compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is found, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers and publishing security-related policies.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
WordPress 6.7.2, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Borlabs Cookie, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Consent checkbox on forms
Cookie consent banner
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
Professional WordPress site with modern design and responsive layout
Multiple contact forms with consent checkboxes indicating GDPR awareness
Cookie consent implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin
No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
Uses Google Analytics for tracking with Site Kit integration
WHOIS data is minimal but domain uses reputable nameservers
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with Gravity Forms for form management and Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics via gtag.js for tracking. The site is hosted behind domaincontrol.com nameservers, likely GoDaddy. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and responsive design for mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present, including screen-reader text and form labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sanktoberholz.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sanktoberholz.de.