Skip to main content

Security report for saltfordhall.co.uk

Saltford Community Association · Non-profit · United Kingdom

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Saltford Community Association operates Saltford Hall, a community venue funded by local donations and managed by voluntary trustees. The organization serves the local Saltford community by providing room hire, hosting events, and offering financial support funds. The website reflects a small non-profit entity focused on community engagement and local services. Technically, the website is built using WYSIWYG Web Builder 21, incorporates Font Awesome icons, and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is basic in design and mobile optimization but functional with clear navigation. Security posture is moderate; no explicit security headers or SSL configuration details were found, and no forms collect sensitive data. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a domain naming rules error from Nominet UK, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the website's legitimate community focus. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy for general audiences, but would benefit from improved security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saltfordhall.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Saltford Community Association is positioned as a local non-profit community service provider managing a community hall and organizing events. Its business model relies on community donations and volunteer management. The target audience is local residents of Saltford. The organization maintains an online presence with social media integration and online ticketing links. The website content is relevant and professional but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data limits external verification of domain legitimacy. The organization appears stable but small in scale, with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. Partnerships are limited to community-related sites and social media platforms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. No forms or sensitive data collection points reduce immediate risk exposure. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The lack of incident response or security contact information further limits readiness for security events. The WHOIS data anomaly introduces uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement HTTPS verification, security headers, and privacy compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure communications.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS domain naming rules error to ensure domain registration legitimacy and improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Saltford Community Association
Registration number
1162948
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Saltford Community Association
Description
Saltford Hall was built with donations from the inhabitants of Saltford and is administered by the Saltford Community Association, a registered charity that serves the needs of the local community. The SCA is managed by voluntary Trustees.
Key services
Community hall management, Room hire, Community events, Financial support fund for residents
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WYSIWYG Web Builder 21, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (not explicitly confirmed)
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a community association site for Saltford Hall, a local non-profit venue.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the website.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter official accounts.
  5. Website uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No forms detected, so no direct data collection from users.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules error, limiting domain trust verification.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. Website design is basic but functional with clear navigation.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using WYSIWYG Web Builder 21, a desktop website builder tool, and uses Font Awesome for icons. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The HTML structure is basic but valid, with meta tags for description, keywords, and viewport for mobile responsiveness. The site lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Mobile optimization is basic, with a responsive viewport but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is basic with meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. No forms or interactive elements are present, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement features. Hosting provider and SSL details are not available from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saltfordhall.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saltfordhall.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.