Skip to main content

Security report for salacgrivaport.lv

Salacgrivas ostas parvalde · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Salacgrivas ostas parvalde operates as a regional port authority located in Latvia, managing the Salacgrīva port and related maritime infrastructure. The website presents the port's historical significance dating back to 1368 and highlights current cargo handling and fishing activities, as well as yacht marina services. The organization targets regional importers, exporters, fishermen, and maritime transport users. The website is built on DIRcms and utilizes several JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience, including jQuery, bxSlider, and Fancybox. Google Analytics is employed for visitor tracking. Security posture is moderate with no detected advanced security headers or explicit privacy policies, though cookie consent is implemented. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the registrant as a Latvian legal entity matching the website's business claims. Overall, the site is functional and credible but could improve in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salacgrivaport.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention salacgrivaport.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for salacgrivaport.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The port authority holds a niche position as a growing regional port in northern Latvia, serving cargo and fishing industries with EU-funded infrastructure projects underway. Its business model focuses on port management and service provision to maritime stakeholders. The website content and WHOIS data align well, indicating a transparent and established entity. The presence of social media and contact details supports engagement and trust. However, the lack of comprehensive privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and risk management. The port's historical roots and active development projects indicate a stable growth trajectory and community integration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or incident response contacts. Cookie consent is present, indicating some privacy awareness. The absence of privacy and terms of service pages, as well as security policies, represents compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The overall security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, enhance privacy transparency, and establish incident response protocols to strengthen trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is fully enforced with strong SSL/TLS configurations and test for vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience across devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Salacgrivas ostas parvalde
Registration number
90000462446
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Salacgrivas ostas parvalde
Description
Salacgrīvas osta ir mūsdienīga reģionālā osta, kas atrodas Rīgas jūras līcī ietekošās Salacas upes grīvā. Ostā pārkrauj dažāda veida kravas, piemēram, kokmateriālus, šķeldu, kūdru, šķembas, celtniecības materiālus un zivis. Ostā darbojas zvejnieki un vasarā ienāk jahtas no dažādām pasaules valstīm.
Key services
cargo handling, fishing port management, yacht marina services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, bxSlider, Fancybox, PhotoSwipe, Superfish, Semantic UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is focused on a regional port authority in Latvia with historical background and current projects.
  3. No privacy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries for UI and galleries.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  8. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies detected in provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent with the business and publicly available.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses DIRcms as its content management system, supplemented by popular JavaScript libraries including jQuery, bxSlider for sliders, Fancybox and PhotoSwipe for image galleries, Superfish for menus, and Semantic UI for styling. The site loads Google Fonts and Google Analytics scripts, indicating standard modern web practices. Performance is moderate with no explicit data on loading speed. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site structure and navigation are clear but could benefit from modernization and enhanced technical SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salacgrivaport.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salacgrivaport.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.