Skip to main content

Security report for safe-archi.fr

SAFE Architecture Urbanisme · Real Estate · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAFE Architecture Urbanisme is a small French architecture and urbanism agency founded in 2020 by Alexandre Sfintesco and Kévin-Antoine Eloy. It operates as part of the Urbense group, focusing on integrated urban planning and real estate development projects. The website presents a professional image with detailed descriptions of the agency, its projects, and team members, targeting clients and professionals in the real estate and urban planning sectors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, uses modern web technologies, and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the overall professional presentation suggests a legitimate business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and publishing a comprehensive privacy policy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safe-archi.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency occupies a niche market within the architecture and urbanism sector in France, leveraging its affiliation with Urbense to offer integrated urban planning services. Its business model centers on providing architectural and urban development consulting, targeting real estate developers and municipal clients. The website's content and social media presence support brand visibility and client engagement. Growth potential is indicated by the agency's recent founding and association with a larger group. No direct revenue streams or certifications are disclosed, but the professional presentation and project portfolio suggest a credible market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy disclosures. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which should be transparently managed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small professional site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy.
  3. Publish a detailed privacy policy outlining data processing and user rights.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SAFE Architecture Urbanisme
Description
Créée en 2020 par Alexandre Sfintesco avec Kévin-Antoine Eloy, l’agence SAFE Architecture Urbanisme fait partie du groupe Urbense, plateforme d’urbanisme opérationnel intégrant les métiers de l’architecte, de l’urbaniste et du développeur immobilier, dans une approche transverse et itérative du projet urbain. Réalisme, optimisme et révélations de situations sont les caractéristiques de l’approche et de l’attitude développée par l’agence.
Key services
architecture, urbanism, real estate development consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Analytics, Modernizr, CSS Grid, Flexbox
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to architecture and urbanism.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  5. Social media presence on Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Google Analytics for tracking.
  7. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  9. Physical address provided in footer: 28 boulevard Poissonnière, 75009 Paris.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing modern front-end technologies such as CSS Grid and Flexbox, and includes the Modernizr library for feature detection. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized. No hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The site structure is clear with well-defined navigation and meta tags supporting SEO. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. The site could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safe-archi.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safe-archi.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.