Skip to main content

Security report for rzlash.com

Beauty Republic · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RZ Lash is an e-commerce retailer specializing in eyelash extension products, brows, wax, and related beauty accessories. The website targets consumers interested in beauty and cosmetic products, offering competitive pricing and free shipping within Latvia for orders over 70 EUR. The business operates primarily in the retail sector within Latvia, with a small-sized company profile. The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting static assets and integrates Google Analytics and CartStack for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality, presenting a professional and consistent brand image. However, the absence of explicit contact information and privacy policy pages limits transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rzlash.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rzlash.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rzlash.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company, operating under the name Beauty Republic, appears to focus on niche beauty products with a strong emphasis on eyelash extensions and related accessories. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, with a clear VAT registration indicating legitimate commercial operations in Latvia. The product catalog is diverse within its niche, including eyelashes, glue accessories, brushes, and storage solutions. The website's integration with tracking and analytics tools suggests an intent to monitor user behavior and optimize marketing efforts. The lack of visible social media or partner domains indicates a potentially limited partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of new product labels and sales promotions suggest active inventory management.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms with advanced user controls, reflecting a baseline commitment to user privacy and security. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels indicates limited transparency in security governance. WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and could be a risk factor. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with additional security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including company email and phone numbers to enhance transparency and customer support.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate commitment to security and facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Beauty Republic
VAT number
LV 40203485478
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Beauty Republic
Description
Online store offering eyelash extension, brows, wax products with competitive prices and high quality. Free shipping for orders in Latvia over 70 EUR.
Key services
Eyelash extensions, Brows care products, Wax products, Jewelry, Accessories for glue, Lash bath and care, Storage solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Cloudfront CDN, CartStack tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with advanced settings
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CartStack
Marketing tools
CartStack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with advanced settings
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern CDN infrastructure
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found
  7. Business VAT number is displayed in footer
  8. No social media links or security policy pages detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform and hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery and scalability. The tech stack includes JavaScript for interactivity and integrates Google Analytics and CartStack for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate with optimized images and lazy loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and security documentation, which are areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rzlash.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rzlash.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.