Skip to main content

Security report for ruzovypatnik.cz

Transparency International – Česká republika o.p.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transparency International – Česká republika o.p.s. is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to fighting corruption and promoting transparency in the Czech Republic. With a small but effective team, they focus on advocacy, legal expertise, public education, and free legal counseling. Their website reflects their mission with professional content, clear messaging, and a focus on public awareness. The organization has been active for over 20 years, positioning itself as a trusted entity in the anti-corruption space. Technically, the website is built on Webflow and uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and CookieScript for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive cookie policy and GDPR-aligned consent mechanisms. Security-wise, while HTTPS is assumed, explicit security headers and policies are not evident. No security.txt or incident response information is published, which could be improved. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for non-profits but reduces transparency somewhat. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with its mission. The main risks relate to limited publicly available security policies and lack of WHOIS transparency. Strategic improvements in security posture and transparency would enhance trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 25 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ruzovypatnik.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on anti-corruption advocacy in the Czech Republic. It leverages a small team to deliver high-impact services including legal analysis, public education, and legislative advocacy. The website serves as a communication and awareness platform, linking to partner organizations and media. Their market position is strong within the Czech anti-corruption ecosystem, supported by Transparency International's global brand. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants, with a focus on public engagement and policy influence. Partnerships with media and branding agencies support their outreach efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and cookie consent management. However, the absence of security headers, security.txt, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through detailed cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The lack of published security policies and WHOIS transparency slightly reduces the overall security posture. Enhancing these areas would improve incident readiness and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response and security policy information on the website.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and regularly audited.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS information or justifying privacy protection to enhance transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Transparency International – Česká republika o.p.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transparency International – Česká republika o.p.s.
Description
Transparency International Česká republika is a non-profit organization focused on fighting corruption, protekce, and clientelism in Czech society. They have a small team of about 15 people and have saved billions from public funds. Their work includes analyzing controversial contracts, promoting anti-corruption laws, providing legal advice, and educating citizens and officials.
Key services
Anti-corruption advocacy, Legal and legislative expertise, Public education, Free legal counseling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Google Fonts, CookieScript Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Doubleclick, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieScript
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to anti-corruption advocacy
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  5. No contact email found, but phone and physical address are present
  6. Use of modern web technologies and consent management tools
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policies published
  8. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Google Fonts, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. CookieScript is used for cookie consent management, providing detailed cookie categorization and user control. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with no major technical issues detected. Accessibility is basic but present. The use of third-party scripts is controlled, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities is recommended. Hosting provider details are not explicit from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ruzovypatnik.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ruzovypatnik.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.