Skip to main content

Security report for ruhrmann-logistik.de

Ruhrmann Logistik GmbH & Co. KG · Transportation · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ruhrmann Logistik GmbH & Co. KG is a well-established logistics company specializing in bulk goods handling and port logistics with multiple locations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The company operates its own port facilities and is part of the larger Hülskens Firmenverband corporate group, which has a long history in the construction and logistics sectors. The website clearly targets business clients in transportation and waste management, offering comprehensive logistics services including ship disposition and specialized material handling. Technically, the website is built on the Contao CMS platform and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swipe.js for UI components. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and includes basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The security posture is solid but could be improved by adding formal security and incident response policies and enhancing HTTP security headers. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected in the content or scripts. WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a trustworthy domain with consistent registration information. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible business presence with good content quality and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security transparency and incident response readiness would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ruhrmann-logistik.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
43
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ruhrmann Logistik operates in the transportation sector with a focus on port and bulk goods logistics. Its competitive advantage lies in owning and operating port facilities at key transport hubs in NRW, enabling integrated logistics solutions. The company benefits from being part of the Hülskens Firmenverband, which provides a broad industrial and logistics ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include logistics services, bulk goods handling, and specialized waste disposal. The target customers are businesses requiring efficient transport and handling of bulk materials, including the waste management industry. The website indicates ongoing investments in infrastructure and environmental compliance, signaling growth and adaptation to regulatory changes. Partnerships with related Hülskens group sites suggest a collaborative corporate strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected in the scripts used. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and improving technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ruhrmann Logistik GmbH & Co. KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ruhrmann Logistik GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Ruhrmann is specialized in comprehensive logistics concepts for bulk goods handling with own port facilities at key transport hubs in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Key services
Bulk goods handling, Port logistics, Ship disposition, Waste disposal services, Tar utilization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Colorbox, Swipe.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented.
  3. Clear navigation with multiple service and location pages.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and accessible.
  5. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. WHOIS data shows consistent domain registration and name servers.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond basic jQuery libraries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Contao CMS with a front-end stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Colorbox, and Swipe.js for interactive elements. The site is structured with semantic HTML and includes meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files loaded but no heavy frameworks detected. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and labels present. The site lacks advanced modern frameworks but is stable and functional. Hosting provider details are not explicit. There is room for modernization and optimization, especially in security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ruhrmann-logistik.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ruhrmann-logistik.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.