Skip to main content

Security report for rucniovladani.cz

HURT s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HURT s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in vehicle modifications for disabled individuals, offering a range of products including hand controls, vehicle entry aids, wheelchair loading solutions, and electric wheelchair drives. The company has a strong market presence with approximately 29 years of experience and partnerships with notable automotive and mobility organizations. Their website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their target audience of disabled drivers and vehicle users. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and AJAX for enhanced user experience, though it lacks some advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious tracking settings, but the absence of a detailed Content-Security-Policy and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern for trust and legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy from a business perspective but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rucniovladani.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on specialized vehicle modifications for disabled persons. Their business model appears to be a mix of direct consumer sales and partnerships with automotive service providers and mobility groups. The presence of multiple language versions and partner domains suggests an international reach or at least servicing multiple language groups. The company leverages partnerships with established automotive brands and mobility organizations to strengthen its market position. Revenue streams likely include sales of vehicle modification products, installation services, and possibly training or consultancy related to vehicle adaptation. The company demonstrates growth potential through innovation in electric wheelchair drives and custom solutions. Strategic partnerships and a long-standing market presence are key competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager with privacy settings that deny ad and analytics storage by default, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. However, the Content-Security-Policy header is empty, which is a missed opportunity to mitigate cross-site scripting and other injection attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page is present, limiting transparency in incident response. Contact information is limited to a phone number with no dedicated security or abuse contacts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to enhance protection against injection attacks.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Add explicit contact information for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HURT s.r.o.
Description
HURT s.r.o. specializes in vehicle modifications for disabled persons, offering hand controls, vehicle entry aids, wheelchair loading solutions, and electric wheelchair drives.
Key services
Hand controls for vehicles, Vehicle entry aids (rotating seats, lifting devices), Wheelchair loading equipment, Electric wheelchair drives, Custom vehicle modifications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Web Fonts, jQuery (implied by usage of scripts), RoyalSlider (image slider), AJAX for search autosuggest
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Tag Manager with consent settings denying ad and analytics storage by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to vehicle modifications for disabled persons.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant trust and legitimacy concern.
  5. Contact phone number is clearly displayed; no company email found in visible content.
  6. Multiple external partner domains linked, indicating a network of related businesses.
  7. Security headers are minimal; CSP header is empty.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used with privacy-conscious consent settings denying ad and analytics storage by default.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, Google Web Fonts for typography, and RoyalSlider for image sliders. AJAX is used for search autosuggest functionality, enhancing user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and responsive, with good SEO practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy notices. Performance appears moderate, with some lazy loading of images to improve load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. The CMS or hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rucniovladani.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rucniovladani.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.