Skip to main content

Security report for rtalabel.org

Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.rtalabel.org represents the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP), a non-profit organization focused on child protection and parental control in the online adult content industry. The site provides the RTA (Restricted To Adults) website label, a voluntary labeling system to help parents filter age-inappropriate content. The organization also offers a verified labeling service and a child exploitation reporting tipline. The website targets parents, webmasters, and stakeholders in the adult industry, emphasizing advocacy and education rather than commercial services. Technically, the site uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for tracking and security, and is hosted behind Cloudflare. The site is mobile responsive and has moderate performance. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Security best practices such as HTTPS and CAPTCHA usage are present, but security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are missing. The security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and branding strongly indicate a legitimate non-profit entity. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and focused on child protection advocacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publishing security and incident response policies, adding security headers, and improving accessibility and SEO features to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rtalabel.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASACP operates as a niche non-profit organization with a clear mission to combat child exploitation online and assist parents in controlling access to adult content. Its business model relies on voluntary participation by webmasters to label their sites and donations to fund its operations. The organization has a stable market position as a recognized advocate in the adult content industry, with partnerships and sponsorships from industry players. Revenue streams include donations and sponsorships. The target customers are parents, adult content webmasters, and industry stakeholders. Growth indicators include ongoing sponsorships and active news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors and social media platforms for outreach. The organization's operations are transparent and focused on advocacy and education.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks several security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in compliance and readiness. Data protection practices are not explicitly documented, and GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting security incidents or abuse.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and site discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP)
Description
ASACP is a non-profit organization dedicated to eliminating child exploitation from the Internet and helping parents prevent children from viewing age-inappropriate content online through the RTA website label and related services.
Key services
RTA Website Label, RTA Verified service, Child Exploitation Reporting Tipline, Parental control software advocacy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, StatCounter, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, StatCounter, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
StatCounter, Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on child protection and parental control labeling.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. Contact available only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and tracking services without clear privacy disclosures.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies.
  8. No signs of adult content hosted on site; content is informational and advocacy-based.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Analytics and StatCounter for visitor tracking and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously, which helps performance. However, some legacy scripts like ga.js are still used alongside gtag.js, indicating partial modernization. The site lacks a CMS or dynamic backend indicators in the HTML. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Technical debt is low but could be reduced by consolidating analytics scripts and improving security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rtalabel.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rtalabel.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.