Skip to main content

Security report for rsline.lv

SIA «RS LINE» · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA «RS LINE» is a Latvian-based logistics and transportation company offering a comprehensive range of international freight services including road, sea, rail, and air transport, as well as cargo storage and customs clearance. The company positions itself as a reliable service provider focused on safe and efficient cargo delivery with personalized client service. The website is professionally designed, primarily in Latvian with multilingual support, targeting businesses requiring international logistics solutions. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and custom scripts, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and business-appropriate but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rsline.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on international freight forwarding and logistics services. Its business model revolves around providing end-to-end cargo transportation solutions across multiple transport modes. The website reflects a small-sized enterprise with a clear service portfolio and a regional market focus in Latvia and neighboring countries. The partnership with Con Group for website development suggests a professional approach to digital presence. Absence of social media and limited online marketing tools may indicate a traditional or B2B-focused marketing strategy. The company’s trust signals include clear contact information and detailed service descriptions, though lack of certifications or compliance statements may affect competitive positioning.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts was found, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided scripts. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant gap under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers to improve protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish an incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate security issue reporting.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience.
  5. Obtain and display relevant industry certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA «RS LINE»
Description
SIA «RS LINE» provides a full range of international transportation services of any complexity using all types of transport. They ensure impeccable service and an individual approach to each client, aiming for safe and efficient cargo delivery with ideal logistics solutions and client-acceptable pricing.
Key services
Autopārvadājumi, Jūras pārvadājumi, Dzelzceļa pārvadājumi, Aviopārvadājumi, Kravu glabāšana, Muitas procedūru veikšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, skel.min.js, skel-layers.min.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some Russian and English language options.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with company email and phone.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. No forms found on the main page except a link to contact page.
  7. Use of AddThis script indicates some social sharing/tracking.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. HTTPS is used as indicated by canonical and resource URLs.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML head.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built front-end with jQuery and skel.js for layout and responsiveness. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. The site lacks a CMS or modern frameworks, indicating potential technical debt and limited scalability. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags, limiting rich search engine results. Accessibility features are minimal, suggesting opportunities for improvement to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rsline.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rsline.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.