Skip to main content

Security report for rp-accidentrepair.co.uk

R&P Accident Repair Centre Ltd · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

R&P Accident Repair Centre Ltd is a small UK-based business specializing in car body and accident repairs, serving Lingfield and surrounding areas. Established in 2008, it offers a broad range of vehicle repair services including dent repairs, SMART repairs, and insurance-related accident management. The company emphasizes quality workmanship, customer service, and convenience through services like courtesy vehicles and mobile estimates. The website is professionally designed with modern technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking visible security headers or advanced protections. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules violations, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website content. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned locally but would benefit from improved compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rp-accidentrepair.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector focusing on vehicle body repairs and accident management. Its market position is that of a trusted local service provider with over 15 years of experience and positive customer reputation. The business model revolves around direct service provision to private motorists and commercial clients, with additional value from insurance liaison and customer convenience services. The website reflects a consistent brand and good content quality, supporting business credibility. The use of industry-standard tools like Audatex and certifications such as UKAS further strengthen its market standing. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The company targets a regional audience in the UK, primarily in Surrey and nearby towns.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, nor any incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No forms on the homepage reduce risk of data exposure, but also limit user interaction. The use of third-party analytics and widgets introduces potential privacy considerations. The lack of WHOIS transparency due to domain registration issues is a notable concern. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve domain registration issues to ensure WHOIS transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
R&P Accident Repair Centre Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
R&P Accident Repair Centre Ltd
Description
R&P Accident Repair Centre is a Lingfield based car bodyshop providing a comprehensive range of accident and bodywork repairs for domestic and commercial clients. Established in 2008, it offers services including car body repairs, accident repairs, dent repairs, SMART repairs, alloy wheel refurbishment, insurance work, accident management, sign-writing, and vehicle graphics. The business serves areas including Lingfield, East Grinstead, Copthorne, Edenbridge, Godstone, and Horley.
Key services
Car Body Repairs, Accident Repairs, Dent Repairs, SMART Repairs, Alloy Wheel Repair & Refurbishment, Insurance Work, Accident Management, Sign-writing, Vehicle Graphics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.2, Bootstrap 5, Bootstrap Icons, Owl Carousel, jQuery Fancybox, Popper.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Elfsight Widgets
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected on homepage to collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Elfsight Widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming rules error
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company domain email and phone
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No forms detected on homepage; minimal data collection visible
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  8. Good branding consistency and trust signals such as certifications and Google reviews
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery 3.6.2, Owl Carousel, and Fancybox for UI components and interactivity. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs and scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags beyond basic meta tags. No forms were detected on the homepage, limiting data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with improved accessibility, SEO, and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rp-accidentrepair.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rp-accidentrepair.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.