Skip to main content

Security report for royaldesign.eu

Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.royaldesign.eu/products is an e-commerce platform specializing in promotional gifts and related products. It offers a broad catalog including gift sets, premium gadgets, office supplies, phone accessories, and more, targeting businesses and individuals seeking promotional items. The site demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with use of modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and Ahrefs Analytics for tracking. However, it lacks visible privacy and terms of service policies, and no explicit contact information is provided, which may impact user trust and compliance. Security posture is moderate with presence of CSRF tokens but absence of key security headers and unclear SSL configuration. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professionally designed but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching royaldesign.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention royaldesign.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for royaldesign.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Royal Design operates in the retail sector focusing on promotional gifts, serving a medium-sized market with a large product catalog. The business model is straightforward e-commerce retail, with product filtering and search capabilities to enhance user experience. The absence of detailed company information and contact data limits deeper business intelligence insights. The use of analytics and marketing tools indicates an intent to optimize sales and customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The company appears to maintain privacy protection on domain registration, which is common for retail businesses.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. The presence of CSRF tokens indicates some protection against cross-site request forgery. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a concern. No explicit SSL/TLS configuration details were available, but external resources are loaded over HTTPS, implying at least basic encryption. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. Overall, security practices should be improved to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and verify essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including company email and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  4. Conduct a security audit to ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and up to date.
  5. Consider adding an incident response page or contact channel for security issues to improve security posture and customer confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online retailer offering a wide range of promotional gifts and products including gift sets, premium gadgets, Christmas items, sport & outdoor accessories, phone accessories, mugs, bottles, bags, tools, office supplies, pens & writing instruments, keyrings, umbrellas, home goods, kids items, and personal accessories.
Key services
Product sales, Online ordering, Product filtering and search
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs Analytics, Owl Carousel, Select2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Use of HTTPS implied by external scripts loaded via HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for promotional gifts.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  3. Privacy policy page or text not found; cookie policy modal present with consent mechanism.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection and query failure.
  6. Uses common web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; CSRF token present.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; content safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Ahrefs Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. UI components include Owl Carousel for sliders and Select2 for enhanced select inputs. The site appears mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but no advanced accessibility markup detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. The site lacks visible CMS identification and hosting provider information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with royaldesign.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review royaldesign.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.