Skip to main content

Security report for rowebb.com

Rowebb Ltd · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rowebb Ltd is a medium-sized UK-based company specializing in the supply of external renders, natural stone cladding, and landscaping products primarily serving the Scottish market. The company operates an e-commerce platform built on WordPress and WooCommerce, offering a wide range of building materials and related products to trade and retail customers. Their market position is strong within their niche, supported by a professional website, active social media presence, and integration with trusted payment and review platforms. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and CookieYes for consent management, ensuring a good level of digital maturity and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements in security headers and explicit security policies are recommended. Privacy compliance is partially met with cookie consent but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy page. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but the absence of WHOIS data and explicit privacy/legal pages suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rowebb.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rowebb Ltd targets construction professionals, landscapers, and trade customers in Scotland and the broader UK market. Their business model combines wholesale supply with direct online sales, leveraging an e-commerce platform to reach customers efficiently. The company benefits from partnerships with well-known brands such as K Rend, Weber, and Trex, enhancing their product portfolio. Their revenue streams likely include product sales through their online store and trade accounts. The company demonstrates growth potential through digital channels and brand partnerships. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and limited legal disclosures may impact trust with some customers. Their social media engagement and use of customer review platforms like Trustpilot contribute positively to their market reputation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of secure payment processing via Stripe. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which limits transparency in incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security policies and regular security audits to maintain and improve its security maturity. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce site but has room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or header.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish a security incident response policy and consider adding a security.txt file.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rowebb Ltd
Description
Rowebb is a Leading Supplier of External Renders, Natural Stone Cladding & Landscape products. Come and check out our new online store!
Key services
Supply of external renders, Natural stone cladding, Landscaping products, Online store for trade and retail customers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Flickity slider, CookieYes consent management, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Stripe payment gateway
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Use of Stripe for payment processing
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Trustpilot
Marketing tools
Trustpilot reviews integration
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and e-commerce functionality
  2. Uses modern web technologies and standard CMS (WordPress + WooCommerce)
  3. Has cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed in header
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS database
  8. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and CookieYes for SEO and privacy compliance respectively. It uses jQuery and Flickity for interactive elements and sliders. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. Stripe is used for payment processing, indicating PCI compliance considerations. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses CDN services for cookie consent scripts. Performance is moderate with prefetching and async loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessible navigation. The site could improve by optimizing security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rowebb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rowebb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.