Skip to main content

Security report for round-table.org

Round Table International · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Round Table International is a well-established global non-profit organization focused on fostering fellowship, personal development, and community service among young men aged 18 to 40/45. With a membership base exceeding 30,000 worldwide, RTI organizes local and international events, educational initiatives, and community projects to empower its members. The website serves as a central hub for information, membership engagement, and access to affiliated initiatives such as RTI University and the RTI Shop. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor, supported by Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, and integrates modern tracking and security tools such as Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though improvements like enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive legal documents publicly available, though direct contact emails and incident response policies are not published. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-suited to its target audience, with moderate user tracking and good content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching round-table.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RTI occupies a strong position in the non-profit sector for young men's fellowship and development, leveraging a global network and multiple digital initiatives to engage members. Its business model centers on membership services, event organization, educational content, and merchandise sales. The organization maintains active partnerships with related domains and initiatives, enhancing its ecosystem. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear navigation, consistent branding, and active social media channels. Growth indicators include a broad international membership and ongoing initiatives like RTI University and Round Table Cares. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness to further build trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration includes clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized transfers. The use of reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are published, limiting transparency. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Incident response contact channels are not provided, which could delay mitigation in case of security events. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's risk profile but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Review and minimize user tracking to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Round Table International
Description
Round Table International is a global non-profit organization that brings together young men aged 18 to 40 (or 45) to promote fellowship, personal development, community service, and networking. Their motto is Adopt, Adapt, Improve. They organize local meetings and international events to empower members to make a positive impact in their communities and personal lives.
Key services
Membership networking, Local and international events, Community service projects, Educational initiatives (RTI University), Merchandise sales (RTI Shop), Knowledgebase (Tabler.Wiki)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Real3D Flipbook plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, reCAPTCHA v2
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v2 on forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-structured WordPress site using Elementor builder.
  2. Multiple official social media channels are linked and active.
  3. Legal documents including privacy policy, cookie policy, terms of use, and other policies are publicly available.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Facebook SDK indicates moderate user tracking.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled on domain.
  10. SSL is properly configured with HTTPS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. It integrates several plugins including Real3D Flipbook for interactive content and Google services for analytics and tag management. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with round-table.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review round-table.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.