Skip to main content

Security report for rossmann.pl

Rossmann · Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rossmann.pl is a major Polish e-commerce platform specializing in cosmetics, personal care, and perfumes. The website offers a wide range of products, nearly 30,000 items, with competitive pricing and promotional campaigns. It targets consumers in Poland seeking beauty and personal care products online. The platform demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as React and Next.js, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The website is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security is well-implemented with HTTPS and some security headers, though there is room for improvement in security header completeness and privacy compliance documentation. No blocking or WAF challenges were detected, indicating full accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rossmann.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rossmann holds a strong market position in the Polish retail cosmetics sector, leveraging both physical stores and a robust online platform. The business model focuses on retail and e-commerce, offering a broad product catalog and leveraging promotions to attract customers. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers and enhance brand visibility. The website's technical infrastructure supports scalability and performance, though some enhancements in privacy and security policies could strengthen customer trust. No direct contact or corporate registration details were found in the HTML, which is typical for large retail sites that centralize such information elsewhere.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Google Tag Manager with consent management scripts, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, explicit privacy and cookie policies are not evident in the provided content, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Security headers are partially implemented but could be enhanced with additional headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly visible, suggesting these may be internal or located on other pages.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to align with privacy regulations.
  3. Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy headers.
  4. Provide visible contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rossmann
Description
Drogeria Rossmann.pl offers cosmetics for makeup and skincare, perfumes, and many other products. It features nearly 30,000 products with competitive prices and special promotions.
Key services
Online sales of cosmetics and perfumes, Promotions and special campaigns, Mobile app for enhanced customer experience
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Tag Manager with consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Synerise
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for cosmetics and personal care products.
  2. Content is rich with product listings, promotions, and brand information.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy links found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  6. No direct contact information or security policy documents found in the HTML snippet.
  7. Social media presence is confirmed via JSON-LD structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, primarily React and Next.js, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO capabilities. It uses Swiper.js for interactive UI components and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Assets are served via a CDN, improving load times. The site is mobile-optimized and uses preloading for fonts and images to enhance performance. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is robust, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could be made to reduce technical debt and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rossmann.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rossmann.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.